Items arranged in order of publication date. Scroll down for all entries. Selection does
not necessarily imply endorsement of findings or research methodology by Diversity Dynamics and its partner organizations.
We regret that we may not be able to repair broken links promptly.
to cultural differences, discriminatory practices, and language barriers, immigrants are often cut off from community support
systems, especially during the period of adjustment to a new society. If government and private agencies are to fulfill their
mission of serving the entire community, they must strive to reach out to immigrants and deliver services in linguistically
and culturally appropriate ways. Without such efforts, integration will be blocked, and the health and well being of
immigrants, as well as the native-born population, will be jeopardized. These resources discuss innovative
approaches to this challenge.|
Leveraging the Skills of Immigrant Health-Care
Professionals in Illinois and Chicago,
Migration Policy Institute,
April 2022, 20 pp.
Authors: Jeanne Batalova & Michael Fix
This MPI issue brief explores the scope of skill underutilization
among highly skilled immigrant health-care professionals in Illinois and Chicago, drawing on U.S. census data and discussions
with national and local health care workforce experts, immigrant advocates, and educational leaders. The authors pay special
attention to the pressures the pandemic has imposed on the health care workforce, and the plight of the 270,000 underemployed
immigrant healthcare professionals in the United States who have remained on the sidelines of the emergency. Paradoxically,
the authors find that immigrants, while only 14 percent of state’s population, play a vital role at all levels in Illinois’
health care workforce, making up 37 percent of physicians and 19 percent of nurses. Yet an estimated 12,000 immigrants with
health or medical degrees in the state remain underemployed or out of work. The effects of the pandemic have only exacerbated
existing shortages of physicians and nurses, even as the state’s demand for primary care services is predicted to grow
sharply in the coming decade, with an aging as well as an increasingly diverse patient population. This population, the authors
note, would be well served by the diverse backgrounds of the state’s underemployed immigrant health professionals. Looking
at models in other states, including New York, Washington State, Minnesota, and Colorado, the brief points to a variety of
institutional and legislative opportunities to address the challenges these immigrants face. These include programs that boost
immigrants’ work skills and professional English proficiency, expanding options for internationally trained health professionals
to work with restricted licenses, and providing counseling for alternative careers in adjacent fields such as clinical research.
Alongside state and local data, the MPI web page for this report includes a data file with estimates of skill underutilization among immigrant and U.S.-born adults with undergraduate degrees in health care and
health science fields in 25 states and nationwide. The analysis also includes details on their race/ethnicity, gender, legal
status, origin countries, and languages spoken other than English. (Jeffrey Vega, Ph.D.)
Vaccine Requirements Predate the COVID-19 Pandemic
by More than a Century
Migration Policy Institute, April 6, 2022, 9 pp.
Chi Chi Huang & Alison Bashford
The COVID-19 pandemic has created significant challenges for international
travel resulting in government-issued vaccine mandates to reduce the global spread of COVID. The authors review the history
of vaccine mandates and the linkages between border control and infectious disease management. “Vaccine certification
has been an internationally recommended approach to manage the spread of infectious diseases.” “Vaccine
passports” can include “paper cards, smartphone apps, and historically even physical scars.” The British
Empire’s experiences during the 1800s with implementing early vaccine requirements for smallpox are discussed. Initially
bodily scars (whether from previous smallpox infection or vaccination) were used as evidence for immunity and determined whether
travelers could leave or enter different countries. Paper vaccine certificates, which include an individual’s
vaccine history, were increasingly adopted in the 1900s, and their use expanded to additional communicable diseases including
polio, yellow fever, cholera, and meningococcal meningitis. Inconsistencies existed, however, in the vaccine certification
system with a “mosaic of rules and regulations” for specific vaccine preventable diseases. This included variations
in required timeframes for receiving a vaccination, number of required shots, and issuing authorities. Episodic outbreaks
of disease also led to intermittent requirements being applied at different destinations such as airports and seaports, and
to certain classes of passengers and migrant workers. Examples of fraudulent and criminal vaccine certifications and
the differential burden of proof applied to travelers of lower socioeconomic status are discussed. Two major international
conferences in 1926 and 1933 led to the development of a “multilateral protocol that recommended using vaccines as a
condition of cross-border movement” and the standardization of international certificates of vaccination. These
processes were further streamlined by the WHO in the 1950s resulting in the issuing of the “Carte Jaune (or Yellow Card)
which became the standard vaccination certification worldwide.” The authors conclude by reminding readers that “migration
and the management of infectious disease – including the certification of vaccination – have been intertwined
for more than a century” and that “recent requirements for certifications around COVID-19 vaccination are anything
but exceptional.” (Robert Like, MD, MS)
Assessing Meaningful Community Engagement: A Conceptual
Model to Advance Health Equity through Transformed Systems of Health,
National Academy of Medicine,
February 14, 2022, 12 pp.
The importance of meaningful community engagement is increasingly being recognized
by a host of key stakeholders and constituency groups. Community engagement is an important strategy for “bringing about
environmental and behavioral changes that will improve the health of the community and its members.” This National Academy
of Medicine project was designed to: 1) identify concepts and metrics that can best assess the extent, process, and
impact of community engagement; and 2) provide community-engaged, effective, and evidence-based tools to those who want to
measure engagement to ensure that it is meaningful and impactful, emphasizing equity as a critical input and outcome.
A diverse Organizing Committee consisting of experts in community engagement—community leaders, researchers, and policy
advisors – conducted an analysis of the peer-reviewed literature and organizational websites for frameworks and conceptual
models of engagement. The authors describe the methodology and participatory process used to develop the new Assessing Community
Engagement (ACE) Conceptual Model and propose eight foundational standards for assessing meaningful and effective community
engagement: 1) Define what should be measured in meaningful community engagement, not what is currently measured; 2)
Be sufficiently flexible to measure engagement in any community; 3) Define health holistically; 4) Allow the community to
see itself in or identify with the language, definitions, and context; 5) Embed equity throughout the model; 6) Emphasize
outcomes of meaningful community engagement; 7) Present a range of outcome options for various stakeholders; and 8)
Communicate the dynamic and transformative nature of engagement. A series of core principles are identified as being essential
for community engagement: trust, bidirectionality, inclusivity, culturally centered, equitable financing, multi-knowledge,
shared governance, ongoing relationships, co-created, and coequal participants. (Robert Like, MD, MS)
Health Care Sanctuaries,
Yale Journal of Health Policy,
Law, and Ethics, November 11, 2021, 67 pp.
Author: Medha D. Makhlouf
This five-part article argues
that immigration surveillance resources should be focused on efforts that produce the greatest benefit and the least collateral
damage to the U.S. health care system. Part I presents data showing that “noncitizens and their family members avoid
health clinics, hospitals, and enrollment in publicly funded health coverage because of immigration-related fears.”
Part II describes the legal framework of immigration surveillance in health care, e.g. the mass collection and analysis of
personal data by public and private actors, and how the “expansion and normalization of interior immigration enforcement
motivates system avoidance behaviors.” The authors emphasize the chilling effects of this system on the ordinary
tasks of life, e.g. accessing health care, seeking COVID testing, participating in publicly funded health care programs, and
enrolling in Medicaid. Additionally, they call attention to the perceived (but not necessarily real) risks of being
interrogated or arrested at or near health care sites because of “gaps, uncertainties, and exceptions” in existing
laws and policies. Part III examines how surveillance in health care can create “tradeoffs between immigration
and health policy.” Among the serious collateral consequences are: delay or avoidance in seeking vaccines or treatment
for infectious disease resulting in increased community disease transmission, and poorer clinical outcomes and less cost-effective
care leading to higher morbidity and mortality from all kinds of medical conditions. The current system also poses ethical
dilemmas for health care providers, who often have to disregard their professional duties to patients, watch people dying
or suffering from treatable and preventable conditions, and violate health equity norms, including commitments to reduce racial
health disparities. Part IV of the report discusses how “the state also compromises its legitimacy through surveillance
in health care.” This can occur when the laws regulating immigration surveillance in health care impose nearly insurmountable
barriers for noncitizens to understand how and when they may access health care without triggering immigration-related consequences.
Part V proposes the creation of “health care sanctuaries” as a means for providing “durable legal protections
against immigration surveillance in health care.” When sanctuaries are politically not feasible to create, “health
care institutions can still take steps to limit information sharing with immigration agencies, provide physical refuge from
immigration enforcement, link noncitizens with legal services, and promote norms of justice and empathy in immigration policy.”
(Robert Like, MD, MS)
Human Mobility and Human Rights in the COVID-19
Pandemic: Revisiting the 14 Principles of Protection for Migrants, Refugees, and Other Displaced Persons,
Cornell International Law Journal,
October 27, 2021, 28 pp.
Authors: T. Alexander Aleinikoff et al
In this collection of symposium papers, the authors revisit some of the 14 Principles* developed by a group of legal and migration
scholars in 2020. The first paper focuses on Principle 2 – the Right to Health (RTH) - and discusses its relevance
for all migrants, barriers to its full realization, and COVID-19’s dramatic impact on migrants’ ability to enjoy
RTH. The second paper examines the legal framework vs. the reality of implementing Principle 2. Topics addressed include:
the impact of repression and neglect, including the worsening of the socio-economic determinants of poor health, inequitable
access to vaccines, and the neglected issue of mental health; and what nation-states should be doing now, including effectively
helping migrating people to access services, and the ramping up of international cooperation and assistance. The third paper
focuses on the following question: “How should international refugee law grapple with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, mistrust,
and refusal?” Topics explored include: vaccine hesitancy in highly fragile systems of trust, individual choice
and mandatory vaccinations, and requirements for mandatory COVID-19 vaccination schemes. In the conclusion of the first paper,
three significant emerging rights challenges are described: how governments have used COVID-19 to exert greater control
over migrant and refugee populations, how “derogations in fact” from human rights treaties have occurred, and
how controls over both internal and external movement have increased in many states. The authors offer potential resistance
and advocacy strategies for addressing these problems. In the concluding recommendations of the second paper, the authors
describe three avenues for re/asserting the rights of all migrants through civil society activism. These include “building
[globally] the political will to support a formal articulation of the rights of all migrants …. as a binding mandate
governing the actions of IOM,” “engaging with regional human rights bodies to support their active engagement
on migrants’ rights within the relevant political bodies,” and amplifying “coordinated, strategic litigation
campaigns to promote the rights of people in the context of human mobility” both nationally and through transnational
(Robert Like, MD, MS)
*For detailed information
on the 14 principles, go to the following site:
A Virus Without Papers: Understanding COVID-19
and the Impact on Immigrant Communities,
Journal on Migration and Human Security 2021 (92:2), 14
Authors: Elizabeth Kiester & Jennifer Vasquez-Merino
This paper provides a comprehensive review
of the cross-disciplinary literature regarding the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on immigrant communities. These
communities “face an intersection of … three major vulnerabilities”: preexisting economic precarity, health
care barriers, and greater risk of infection as essential workers. The authors carried out Zoom interviews with 26 immigrant
service providers in Pennsylvania and New York, including lawyers, case workers, religious leaders, advocates, doctors, and
educators. Three key themes emerged from these interviews: “the consequences of being an essential worker, the absence
of social safety nets, and the insufficient actions of ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] pertaining to immigrant health
and safety in detention centers and continuing deportation of immigrants in the face of COVID-19.” The authors make
the following policy recommendations: 1) Congress and states should pass legislation to provide COVID-19 relief payments
to all essential workers, regardless of their status, as compensation for putting their lives on the line to keep the economy
running; 2) Federal and state governments should expand coverage of Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Programs
(CHIP) to include immigrant essential workers and their children, regardless of their status; and 3) DHS should not refer
essential workers to removal proceedings, and immigration courts should terminate all removal proceedings for essential workers
without criminal records. Additionally, the authors urge the expansion of the Affordable Healthcare Act for those who do not
qualify for Medicaid but earn too little to afford insurance on their own. They also encourage rigorous enforcement of workplace
health and safety standards, particularly when it comes to farming, meatpacking, food production, and food service industries.
(Robert Like, MD, MS)
COVID-19 and the State of Global Mobility in 2020,
for Migration and Migration Policy Institute,
April 2021, 57 pp.
Authors: Meghan Benton et al
may never have been a year like 2020 —almost every country shut down borders, grounded flights and halted immigration
and resettlement programs. Meghan Benton and her colleagues explore the effects of this disruption on human migration in the
article “COVID-19 and the State of Global Mobility in 2020,” published jointly by the International Organization
for Migration and the Migration Policy Institute. The COVID-19 pandemic affected the regions and countries of the world in
different ways, creating multiple effects on migrants, including increasing the gap between “movers and non-movers,”
increasing socioeconomic precarity, and strengthening the dependence-exploitation dynamic many migrants face when forced to
deal with smugglers and traffickers. The authors also attempt to predict the future of public health responses to the ongoing
pandemic, suggesting that vaccination and routine testing certificates may be the most effective public health strategy moving
forward. This policy, however, has the potential to exacerbate gaps between the rich and poor, as access to vaccines and to
quality testing has proven challenging to lower income countries. To improve outcomes, the report suggests that international
bodies and governments explore lower-cost mitigation efforts (like multistage or combined testing and quarantine measures),
enhance cooperation, emphasize transparency and take an inclusive approach. Overall, governments and international organizations
must work to build a system that brings us out of this pandemic, prevents the next one, and eases the burden on migrants,
“who have borne the brunt of the current pandemic,” even when there is little evidence that mobility controls
played a significant role in stopping the spread of the pandemic. (Katelin Reger for The Immigrant Learning Center’s
Public Education Institute)
Home Health Care Workers: Immigrants Can Help Care
for an Aging U.S. Population,
National Immigration Forum, May 28, 2021, 19 pp.
This report discusses the dramatic growth of the older adult population in the U.S., and the need
for addressing significant labor shortages in the home health care industry. The author emphasizes the important role immigrants
can play as essential home health care workers, but notes the many challenges they face in doing so. The report reviews
the changing demographics of the elderly population, pointing out that “by 2035, older adults, 65 and over, will replace
children, under 18, as the largest population in the U.S.” Long-term care needs and institutional costs are increasing,
and life expectancy is longer. Preferences exist for home-based care, but “the ratio of native-born workers to retirees
is declining leading to labor shortages in low- and middle-skilled occupations,” such as direct care workers, and these
disparities are especially true in rural areas. “Immigrants, who already work in large numbers in the sector, could
mitigate workforce shortages and be a major contributor to the long-term care of the elderly.” Barriers to filling home
health care demand include: inadequate training and professional development, financial barriers to obtaining training,
limited English language proficiency, and lack of digital and health information technology skills. The report makes
the following recommendations: 1) Provide Expanded and More Flexible Home Health Care Training and Education; 2) Pass
the Gateway to Careers Act, S. 52; 3) Expand Pell Grants to Include Short-Term 75-Hour Credential Programs; 4) Develop Federal
Training Standards for Personal Care Aides; 5) Expand Contextualized English Language Programs; and 6) Provide Digital Skills
Training. The author also offers a number of recommendation in the area of immigration policy: 1) Create a Low-Skilled
Non-immigrant Employment-based Visa; 2) Designate Home Health Care Aides as a “Schedule A” Shortage Occupation;
and 3) Create New Immigrant Status Opportunities for Home Health Care Workers.
(Robert Like, MD, MS)
The Impact of COVID-19 on Immigration Detention,
Frontiers in Human Dynamics,
April 8, 2021, 10 pp.
Author: Fatma E. Marouf
COVID-19 has spread quickly through immigration detention
facilities in the United States. As of December 2, 2020, there have been over 7,500 confirmed COVID-19 cases among detained
noncitizens. This Article examines why COVID-19 spread rapidly in immigration detention facilities, how it has transformed
detention and deportation proceedings, and what can be done to improve the situation for detained noncitizens. Part I identifies
key factors that contributed to the rapid spread of COVID-19 in immigration detention. While these factors are not an exhaustive
list, they highlight important weaknesses in the immigration detention system. Part II then examines how the pandemic changed
the size of the population in detention, the length of detention, and the nature of removal proceedings. In Part III, the
Article offers recommendations for mitigating the impact of COVID-19 on detained noncitizens. These recommendations include
using more alternatives to detention, curtailing transfers between detention facilities, establishing a better tracking system
for medically vulnerable detainees, prioritizing bond hearings and habeas petitions, and including immigration detainees among
the groups to be offered COVID-19 vaccine in the initial phase of the vaccination program.
Behavioral Health Implementation Guide for the
National Standards for Culturally and linguistically Appropriate Services in Health and Health Care,
Office of Minority Health, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, 2021, 24 pp.
The Office of Minority Health’s (OMH) National CLAS Standards are “designed
to improve the quality of care, help eliminate health care disparities, and advance health equity by establishing a blueprint
for health and healthcare organizations to implement culturally and linguistically appropriate services.” Originally
released in 2000 and subsequently enhanced in 2013, they were operationalized with the publication of a Blueprint for Advancing
and Sustaining CLAS Policy and Practice, along with various implementation tools and assessment resources. Due to the
growing recognition that “there was less participation in and engagement with the standards among behavioral health
providers,” the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) worked with the OMH to develop this
Guide. Organized around the overarching themes of the 15 standards, the Guide reviews: the Principal Standard
(Standard 1); Governance, Leadership and Workforce (Standards 2-4); Communication and Language Assistance (Standards 5-8);
and Engagement, Continuous Improvement, and Accountability (Standards 9-15). Each section (except for the Principal
Standard) includes the following content: the purpose of the standard, a hypothetical behavioral health scenario relevant
to the standard; implementation strategies related to the scenario; and examples of ‘real-life’ programs showing
the standards ‘in action.’ The report is intended to reach the following key audiences: accreditation and
credentialing agencies, advocacy organizations, behavioral health care staff and administrators, governance and policy leadership,
patients/consumers and their families, professional training institutions and faculty, public health workforce, and purchasers
of behavioral health services. (Robert Like, MD, MS)
The Integration of Immigrant Health Professionals:
Looking Beyond the COVID-19 Crisis,
Migration Policy Institute,
April 2021, 12 pp.
Authors: Jeanne Batalova et al
In this publication, the authors address the following
two issues: first, the extent to which pre-pandemic and COVID-19-related trends will influence the demand for and availability
of healthcare workers in the United States; and second, how 270,000 immigrant and refugee health workers whose skills are
underutilized might help the country meet that demand. In reaching their conclusions, the authors conducted interviews with
more than 50 medical and public-health professionals, hospital administrators, labor market and health policy experts, and
representatives of organizations that promote the integration of immigrant professionals. The authors believe that the professional,
language, and cultural skills of internationally trained health professionals, many of whom are unemployed or working in low
skilled jobs, represent a critical resource for the nation. Their potential contribution is all the more important considering
the high numbers of frontline health workers who are burned out and leaving the field, the aging of the U.S. population, and
the country’s growing cultural and linguistic diversity. The paper discusses lessons learned during the pandemic by
states that used their governors’ executive authority to temporarily suspend or adjust licensing requirements to boost
the ranks of available immigrant workers in health services. Although efforts to address licensing, placement, training, and
educational barriers facing internationally trained healthcare professionals are primarily the responsibility of state government,
the authors argue that the federal government should provide leadership and funding for reforms in this area. (Robert Like,
Reversing Immigration Law’s Adverse Impact
(Chapter 35 in S. Burris et
al, COVID-19 Policy Playbook: Legal Recommendations for a Safer, More Equitable Future), February 15, 2021, 6 pp.
Wendy E. Parmet of Northeastern University School of Law argues that the Trump administration’s
policies were especially punitive during the COVID-19 pandemic, rendering some 46 million immigrants in the United
States vulnerable to public health hazards. With an accelerated rate of immigrant detentions during the Trump administration,
camps and prisons turned into “tinder boxes” for infection, and science-based public health policies were largely
overlooked. The author suggests that it is critical to understand how immigration laws can heighten vulnerability to
pandemics in order to prevent another failed response to a future public health crisis. Millions of immigrants living
without basic health care benefits could become vectors of infectious diseases. Simply repealing Trump era policies,
however, is not enough; immigration reform must be considered a vital policy tool. Such reform would include offering paths
to legalization for undocumented immigrants, increasing healthcare coverage among non-citizens, and reducing reliance
on enforcement and detaining immigrants who do not pose a risk to public safety. The author gives recommendations at
both the federal level, such as repeal of the public charge provision in the Immigration and Naturalization Act, and state
level, such as providing Medicaid and CHIP to all otherwise eligible noncitizens. (Samah Rizvi for The Immigrant Learning
Center’s Public Education Institute)
Mapping Key Determinents of Immigrants’ Health
in Brooklyn and Queens
Center for Migration Studies, February 2021, 36 pp.
Vicky Virgin and Robert Warren
This report examined the determinants of immigrant health, focusing primarily
on noncitizens and undocumented individuals living in Brooklyn and Queens, New York. The goal of the study was to enable healthcare
providers, government agencies, and non-profit migrant-serving entities to identify gaps in their services to immigrant populations,
and to help meet the needs of subgroups with heightened risk of adverse health outcomes. Using American Community Survey and
other data for the years 2014-2018, the authors generated “detailed population profiles … for native-born citizens,
naturalized citizens, legal noncitizens, and undocumented immigrants” in relationship to selected determinants of health
in 32 community districts (CDs) in Brooklyn and Queens. The researchers found that poverty, overcrowding, undocumented residency
status, limited English proficiency, lack of a high school education, and percent uninsured were associated with poorer health
outcomes. However, significant variations existed among immigrant sub-groups. Naturalized citizens, for example, had health
profiles more like the native-born population than noncitizens. Noncitizens also had relatively larger percentages of essential
workers than the native-born or naturalized populations and thus were more likely to have been adversely affected by the COVID-19
crisis. Lack of health insurance – an important health determinant – affected the undocumented population more
than it did residents with legal status. The authors concluded with a series of recommendations relating to improving health
care access and insurance coverage, eliminating the public charge rule, addressing job and housing insecurity, increasing
outreach and disseminating information, facilitating citizenship and naturalization services, and attaining legal status.
Understanding that “immigrants are a heterogeneous group with many different legal statuses” is an important contribution
of this study. A holistic and tailored approach to service delivery in specific neighborhoods will be needed to address the
determinants of immigrant health and improve health outcomes. (Robert Like, MD, MS)
Community-Level Factors Associated with Racial
And Ethnic Disparities In COVID-19 Rates in Massachusetts,
Health Affairs, 39:11 (2020),
Authors: Jose F. Figueroa et al
This report by researchers at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public
Health and Harvard Medical School looks at racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 infection rates in Massachusetts, focusing
on demographic, occupational, and economic factors contributing to higher risk for COVID-19. Massachusetts has had one
of the highest case and death rates in the country, with disproportionate impacts on Black and Latino populations, a trend
repeated in states nationwide. Using data from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and the 2013–18 American
Community Survey, a cross-sectional analysis of 351 Massachusetts cities and towns from January 1 to May 6, 2020 found that
several factors (foreign-born noncitizen status, household size, and job type, especially work in food services occupations)
are associated with the higher COVID-19 rates among Latinos. However, these same factors do not appear to explain higher case
rates in Black communities. Other systemic inequities not included in the study may contribute to the rate of spread of COVID-19
among Black populations, including high incarceration rates, residence in areas with more multiunit dwellings, and neighborhood
segregation leading to disparities in health care access and greater exposure to environmental hazards. The study concludes
that further research into the social and economic factors underlying COVID-19-related health disparities and new policies
to address risk factors and institutional racism will be critical to controlling the epidemic and improving health equity.
These policies include public health and policy efforts that improve access to health care, address crowded housing and environmental
hazards, and protect essential workers in public-facing roles. (Jeffrey Gross, Ph.D.)
Entry Denied: COVID-19, Race, Migration, and Global
University of Maryland School
of Law Research Paper, December 22, 2020, 8 pp.
Author: Matiangai V.S. Dirleaf
This essay examines “how
the racialization of diseases is reflected in historical and ongoing United States’ migration law and policy as well
as the global health law regime.” The author argues that there has been “a long history of othering and denigrating
Black, Indigenous and other people of color as infection-prone, afflicted with exotic sicknesses and generally unhealthy.”
She provides a brief history of the “othering” of selected populations in the US, using as examples, syphilis
(Blacks), cholera and smallpox (Chinese), HIV/AIDS (Haitians), and COVID-19 (Latinx migrant workers). These groups often have
experienced invasive and humiliating medical inspections, migration shutdowns, detention, and stigmatization. The author reviews
how “containing racialized threats of disease contagion from colonized peoples” led to “the creation of
an international system of quarantine regulations.” The International Sanitary Conventions of 1892, 1897, 1903, 1912,
1926, and 1944, and related treaties required notification for cases of cholera, plague, yellow fever, smallpox, and typhus,
and were shaped primarily by the fear of imported disease by people in Western countries. After reviewing the principles that
guided the establishment of the World Health Organization (WHO), the author discusses WHO’s power to declare a Public
Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), including the ways in which the US and other countries racialized PHEIC
responses to the Ebola outbreak in 2014-2015 and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The author acknowledges that while it’s
important to understand “how the history of diseases and responses to diseases is linked to colonial and ongoing politics
of racial exclusion,” there are many other factors along with race that influence migration and global public health
law and policy. (Robert Like, MD, MS)
Report of the Foreign Trained Health Professional
Licensing Pilot Project,
New Mainers Resources Center, Portland Adult Education, October
2020, 31 pp.
Authors: Sally Sutton & Vanessa Sylvester
This report is
an overview of results of a pilot project in Maine to increase the diversity and cultural competence of the healthcare workforce
by reducing the barriers to training, licensing, and employment faced by foreign trained health professionals. Many immigrants
and minority group members face barriers themselves to accessing health services, as seen in the disparate effects of the
Coronavirus across population groups. The premise behind this project is that greater workforce diversity would make the entire
system more culturally competent. The recommendations in this report take into account the fact that the majority of foreign-trained
health professionals in Maine are refugees. The authors recommend a series of modifications to state programs, licensing
requirements, higher education, and employer practices in order to put more doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and others working
at or close to their former training fulfilling diversity and staffing deficiencies. Health employers, for example, can help
their entry-level employees develop a career plan and gain the experience necessary to qualify for licensure. The report asserts
that the problems faced by foreign-trained health professionals are “deep-seated systemic issues that require a concerted
and collaborative effort for change at a number of different levels by a wide range of stakeholders.” The report also gives recommendations for specific health care professions. (Julianne P. Weis, Ph.D.)
A systematic Review of Medical-Legal Partnerships
Serving Immigrant Communities in the United States,
Journal of Immigrant and Minority
Health, September 25, 2020, 12 pp.
Authors: Avery League et al
Medical-Legal Partnerships are increasingly
being embraced as a service delivery model for addressing the social, environmental, and political determinants of health
experienced by low-income and vulnerable populations. The authors of this article carried out a systematic literature review
to examine “existing forms of medical-legal partnerships that demonstrate how medical and legal professionals work together
to meet the unique needs of immigrants.” Five online databases were searched, and 222 English language articles
(published between 2010-2019) were selected for initial screening. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria,
the authors retained 18 articles for further analysis. Forty-two questions were developed relating to 10 different themes.
Cross-referrals of clients for legal and medical services (especially asylum evaluations) occurred between lawyers, physicians,
and their clinics “Partnerships often engaged in advocacy work, provided translation services, and referred clients
to non-medical providers and legal services.” Co-location of services was less often seen. The articles generally
lacked information about “follow up from the partnerships about the duration of collaborations,” “long-term
legal and patient outcomes,” “duration of services through the partnership,” “success/failure rates
of clinical care,” and “systems in place to support people’s legal and medical needs.” An essential
component identified was demonstrating cultural and structural competence. This included understanding diversity within and
across immigrant, refugee, and asylee populations as well as the impacts of trauma, persecution, and stigma. Addressing institutional
barriers (e.g., “translation services, financial assistance, affordability, access to psychiatric care”) and integrating
medical, mental health, and legal services was also of critical importance. The authors conclude that “[m]edical-legal
partnerships are crucial for investing in the mental and physical health of immigrant communities.” They also
note, however, that “… despite the increasing salience of such partnership, few have written up their lessons
learned and best practices.” Further ethnographic studies and dissemination of real-world findings are needed.
General information about medical-legal partnerships may be found on the website of the National Center
for Medical-Legal Partnership at George Washington University. (Robert Like, MD, MS)
Immigration Enforcement and the
Mental Health of Latino High School Students,
Migration Policy Institute,
September 2020, 67 pp.
Authors: Randy Capps et al
This study examines the mental health toll on Latino
teenagers arising from the deportation activities of the Trump administration. The authors also present the findings of a
survey of Latino students at five high schools in Harris County, Texas, and six high schools in four Rhode Island cities,
conducted during the 2018–19 school year. While actual deportation numbers under President Trump never reached the peak
of the Bush and Obama years, ICE arrests have remained very high over the last years, increasing levels of anxiety and fear
among Latino teenagers. The authors found that the majority of respondents (59 percent) feared someone close to them would
be arrested and deported, one-third feared that they themselves would be deported, and 56 percent personally knew someone
who had been deported. These fears of deportation were lower but still high in jurisdictions which have tried to limit ICE
activities, like the state of Rhode Island, where 30 percent of Latino teenagers reported changing their behavior, e.g. avoiding
driving or going to the doctor, as a result of deportation fears. Findings from both the Texas and Rhode Island surveys also
show downstream health effects of deportation fears and the anxiety caused by Trump administration policies restricting immigration.
Most troubling, reports of discrimination, traumatic life events, and averse mental health conditions such as PTSD, depression
or anxiety were experienced in an alarming number of teenager respondents. Teens compensated for these averse health indicators
with high levels of reported personal goals, spiritual and school engagement, and family support. Many schools have tried
to mitigate the deportation anxieties with safe haven measures, but school funding and staffing resources are highly limited
to meet the enormous needs. Shifting the current political environment would help ease much of the deportation fears and anxieties
in Latino teenagers, as well as bolstering support networks within the schools and communities to assist in providing more
robust mental health services. (Julianne P. Weis, Ph.D.)
COVID-19 and the Remaking of U.S. Immigration Policy? Empirically Evaluating the Myth
of Immigration and Disease,
UC San Diego, US Immigration
Policy Center, April 22, 2020, 11 pp.
Author: Tom K. Wong
Concerned that the Trump administration is using
a centuries-old bias, i.e. blaming immigrants for importing disease into the United States -- a myth unsupported in the academic
literature – the author of this study conducted an analysis of immigration rates since 2000 to see if they correlated
with upswings in swine flu infections. He looked at immigration indicators specific to the southern border, such as the number
of people entering over the southern border, the number of people requesting and granted asylum, as well as general admission
numbers for the country as a whole. Covering a 20-year period that included the H1N1 pandemic in 2009, the author found no
relationship between these numbers and fluctuations in flu rates. He concludes that “The results presented here bolster
the argument that the Trump administration may, indeed, be using the global COVID-19 pandemic as a guise to further change
U.S. immigration policies, which in this case means effectively choking off access to our asylum system, as well as suspending
immigration into the U.S. more generally.”
Combatting COVID-19: Why Community-based Investigation and Contact Tracing is Crucial,
WKF Giving Fund, May 8, 2020, 24 pp.
Authors: Ed Kissam & Jo Ann Intili
plans to recruit, train, and mobilize a workforce of 10,000-20,000 case investigation and contact-tracing workers. This report
makes recommendations as to how to recruit and deploy this workforce. As the state gradually opens up, and people weary of
observing social distancing guidelines, the ability of this workforce to contain local flare-ups of the virus is crucial to
protecting the general population until a vaccine becomes readily available. Anticipating that low-income working poor households,
through the kinds of jobs they hold and their living conditions, will have greater exposure to the virus, the authors of the
report believe that it is crucial to target this population in the contact-tracing program. The authors argue “that
the most critical organization and individual competencies (for case investigators) are not health-specific knowledge but,
rather, experience and efficacy in reach and communicating well with hard-to-reach households.” They further suggest
that immigrant-serving organizations should play an active part in the program, not only because immigrants remain especially
vulnerable to infection, but also because millions of Californians live in mixed-status families.
The Hidden Curve: Estimating the Spread of COVID-19 among People in ICE Detention,
of Justice, June 2020, 14 pp.
Authors: Dennis Kuo et al
Little is known about the prevalence of COVID-19 in immigration detention facilities run by ICE. Although ICE regularly updates some basic statistics on its COVID-19
webpage, its reporting, according to the authors of this report, is inconsistent and inadequate, making it impossible to answer
basic questions about the risks detained people face. To remedy this deficiency, the Vera Institute of Justice has built an
epidemiological model to estimate the prevalence of COVID-19 in detention. Using the most recent publicly available ICE data,
the model specifically explores how new book-ins to—and frequent transfers between—detention centers may be contributing
to COVID-19’s spread among people in immigration detention. The model makes clear that ICE is severely underreporting
the prevalence of COVID-19 in detention. As Vera’s model demonstrates, the true scale of the spread of COVID-19 in ICE
detention is likely to be “shockingly high.”
Barriers to COVID-19 Testing and Treatment:
Immigrants without Health Coverage in the United States,
Migration Policy Institute,
May 2020, 17 pp.
Authors: Randy Capps & Julia Gelatt
This MPI fact sheet estimates the number of uninsured
noncitizens nationwide and by state, and how many are ineligible for Medicaid coverage due to immigration status. Immigrants,
many of whom live in urban and rural communities with high infection rates and work in frontline industries such as health
care and food production with a high risk of transmission, are among the most vulnerable U.S. residents during the COVID-19
pandemic. Rapid job loss—rising faster among immigrants than U.S. residents as a whole—also means loss of employer-based
health insurance and more dependence on publicly-funded healthcare, primarily Medicaid, for screening and treatment. Yet eligibility
restrictions based on immigration status mean that many low-income noncitizen immigrants do not qualify for Medicaid or other
publicly funded services. Fears of immigration enforcement or public charge impacts discourage even many who are eligible
from seeking testing and treatment. While recent congressional aid packages expanded funding for COVID-19 testing and treatment
for the uninsured, many noncitizens including both legal immigrants and the unauthorized remain excluded from coverage. In
a pre-COVID-19 scenario of 4 percent unemployment, MPI estimated 7.7 million noncitizens did not have public or private health
insurance coverage, including 2.1 million low-income unauthorized immigrants and 500,000 low-income LPRs and nonimmigrants
excluded from Medicaid. In a scenario of 17.5 percent unemployment (the rate at the end of April 2020), 9.3 million noncitizens
would be uninsured, with 2.5 million unauthorized immigrants and 700,000 LPRs and nonimmigrants excluded from Medicaid. In
a high-employment scenario of 25 percent unemployment, 10.8 million noncitizens would be uninsured, with 2.9 million unauthorized
immigrants and 800,000 LPRs and nonimmigrants excluded from Medicaid. In all three scenarios 55 percent of uninsured were
unauthorized immigrants and 45 percent LPRs or nonimmigrants. Without substantial federal assistance, the study concludes,
serving uninsured patients will strain state and local budgets. Moreover, leaving millions of noncitizens uninsured or afraid
to seek COVID-19 testing and treatment also risks spreading the virus and undermining public health for all Americans. (Jeffrey
Crisis within a Crisis: Immigration in the United States in a Time of COVID-19,
Migration Policy Institute, March 26, 2020, 7 pp.
Muzaffar Chishti &
This article in MPI’s Policy Beat reviews the various immigration policy changes implemented
by the Trump administration ostensibly in response to the coronavirus pandemic. These changes include greatly restricted entry
at U.S. land borders with Mexico and Canada (for example, by barring the entry of asylum seekers); suspension of hearings
in immigration courts for non-detained individuals; the suspension of in-person processing services by USCIS, and of routine
visa services by U.S. embassies and consulates abroad. The article also highlights the public health consequences of the detention
of immigrants in ICE facilities where they are at risk of an outbreak of COVID-19. The authors also discuss the fear many
immigrants have of accessing health care with the administration’s new public charge rule going into effect in February
just as the pandemic was taking hold in the U.S. (even though USCIS has said that treatment related to COVID-19 will not be
included in a public charge analysis). There is also some discussion of the exclusion of immigrants from the financial relief
legislation passed thus far by Congress in response to the economic fallout from the pandemic. At the end of the article is
a bibliography of links to Trump administration policies and other resources related to immigration and COVID-19. (Maurice Belanger, Maurice Belanger Consulting)
“You Will Never See Your Child Again:” The Persistent Psychological Effects of Family
Physicians for Human Rights, February 2020, 38 pp.
Authors: Hajar Habbach et al
This is a
study of the psychological and physiological effects of family separation on 17 adults and nine children who had been separated
for an average of 60-69 days under the Trump administration's "Zero Tolerance" Policy. All participants in the study
had fled traumatic experiences in their home countries before arriving at the United States. Believing their children would
be safe when arriving in the US, parents were instead separated forcibly, and often secretly, from their children with no
explanation from immigration authorities. PHR described symptoms and behaviors consistent with trauma and its effects in every
study participant. Past traumas compounded those experienced during family separation, and every study participant met diagnostic
criteria for at least one mental health condition, e.g. PTSD, depression, or anxiety. The cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment
towards these families rises to the level of torture according to the PHR experts. Because of the "significant distress"
and ongoing functional impairment caused by these traumas, the physicians recommend further intervention and ongoing therapeutic
support. PHR also recommends: providing redress to the victims of torture, reuniting those families that were separated, including
in cases where the parents have been deported, and prosecution of US officials who broke the law throughout this process.
(Julianne P. Weis, Ph.D.)
Why cultural safety rather than cultural competency is required to achieve health
equity: a literature review and recommended definition,
International Journal for Equity in Health,
18: 174 (2019), 17 pp.
Authors: Elana Curtis et alIn this paper, the authors seek to clarify the current understanding of “cultural safety” and
“cultural competency,” and to argue that health practitioners and health care systems must move beyond the notion
of “competency” if they want to gain insight into the systems and power dynamics that are often the main drivers
of health inequities. Through an international literature review, examination of New Zealand’s cultural competency legislation,
and consultation with Maori healthcare providers, the authors determine that ethnic and indigenous inequities in health outcomes
have traditionally been explained through the lens of physiological, genetic or cultural difference. However, the authors
posit that inequity is actually caused primarily by socio-economic deprivation, unequal access to care, and intentional or
unintentional bias from healthcare providers. The authors suggest that health care organizations and professionals organize
their work around the principle of cultural safety, which not only encourages the examination of difference in cultural practices
but also calls for a critical analysis of inter-group power dynamics. (Clare Maxwell for The Immigrant Learning Center’s Public Education Institute)
Public Health Insurance Expansion for Immigrant Children and Interstate Migration of Low-Income
Immigrants (Key Points),
Journal of the American Medical Association – Pediatrics, November 18, 2019
Authors: Vasil Yasenov et al
The extension of state-funded health insurance to legal permanent resident children
and pregnant women with less than five years of residency in the United States does not lead to greater in-migration of immigrant
adults from other states. This study utilizes data on 208,060 immigrants from the American Community Survey from 2000 through
2016 to compare migration rates for eligible and ineligible immigrants before and after the health insurance expansions. The
data analysis shows that there is no association between in-migration and expansion of public health insurance. For example,
the change in the rate of in-migration following coverage expansion was not higher than 1.78 percentage points for immigrant
children and 1.38 percentage points for pregnant immigrant women, lower than the average move rate of 3 percent across the
entire sample. In the light of these results, the authors conclude that states considering coverage expansion need not be
concerned with in-migration and can instead focus on the cost-effectiveness of preventive pediatric and pre-natal health care.
(Jasmina Popaja for The Immigrant Learning Center’s Public Education Institute)
Care for America’s Elderly And Disabled People Relies on Immigrant Labor,
Health Affairs, 38:6 (2019), 8 pp.
Authors: Leah Zallman et al
As the elderly population in the United States is expected to double in size by 2050, health care workforce shortages are
expected to increase. Three-and-a-half million additional workers will be needed in the next decade alone. Although several
studies have examined the role that immigrants play in the formal health care sector, “Care for America’s Elderly
and Disabled People Relies on Immigrant Labor” focuses on the immigrant role in nonformal settings such as private housing
and nonmedical facilities. The study used the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the 2018 Current Population Survey
(CPS), a nationally representative survey conducted by the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which collected
data on 180,084 people in March 2017. The researchers found that immigrants constituted 18.2 percent of health
care workers, 27.5 percent of direct care workers, and 30.3 percent of nursing home housekeeping and maintenance workers.
The category of direct care workers includes home health and personal care aides. The authors observe that these workers allow
hundreds of thousands of Americans to live at home or in other nonmedical settings such as senior housing-- thereby reducing
the need for expensive institutional care. “Curtailing immigration,” the authors conclude, “will almost
certainly move us in the wrong direction…” in ensuring quality health care for all Americans
The Worst of Health: Law and Policy at the Intersection of Health and Immigration,
Symposium Paper, Indiana Health Law Review, 16: 2 (2019), 22 pp.
Author: Wendy E. Parmet
Due to the influence of nativist forces, the United States has had a long history of misguided health policy and law. This
essay reflects on past and present immigration, healthcare and public health policies and shows how they are connected to
and impact each other. Parmet cites various cases of immigration policy that had a harmful effect on public health, from the
quarantine of Chinese-Americans in San Francisco during a 1900 epidemic to the recent Trump administration family separation
policies. Parmet utilizes these historical case examples to illustrate the damaging conflation of immigration and health policy
and the extent to which these federal policies are fueled by anti-immigrant and racist sentiment. She stresses that these
policies are not only exclusionist, they are ineffective, costly and dangerous to public health. The author also strongly
opposes the Trump administration’s regulation to expand the meaning of “public charge,” which, she points
out, was used to turn away Jewish refugees during the Holocaust. The article recommends that policymakers rethink the ethical
foundations at the intersection of immigration and public health law. (Olivia Pickard for The Immigrant Learning Center’s
Public Education Institute)
Approaches to Protect Children’s Access to Health and Human Services in an Era of Harsh
Institute of Human Development and Social Change, New York University, March 18, 2019, 26 pp.
Hirokazu Yoshikawa et al
This report examines the barriers low-income immigrant children and their families
encounter when trying to access social services in a climate of heightened immigration enforcement and hostility towards immigrants.
The paper also outlines a wide range of strategies that can partly overcome these barriers. In the U.S., one in four children
lives with at least one immigrant parent, and more than one-quarter of children of immigrants have an undocumented parent
or are undocumented themselves. Recent policy changes and proposals have severely disrupted the lives and well-being of many
immigrant families. Citing examples of best practices from across the country, the authors make 12 recommendations to mitigate
the adverse affects that these policies have on the nearly 18 million at-risk immigrant children. Among the solutions are
ensuring the confidentiality of public benefit records, expanding program eligibility through state action, easing enrollment
challenges, increasing access to immigrant legal services, expanding family educational programming, providing identity documents
and allowing child-only applications. In order to benefit from any of these recommendations, the authors suggest improved
collaboration between community stakeholders, policymakers and immigrant individuals, as well as more robust government infrastructure,
such as offices of immigrant affairs, to coordinate policy responses. (Patrick Bloniasz for the Immigrant Learning Center's
Public Education Institute)
Health Justice for Immigrants,
Journal of Law and Public Policy (University of Pennsylvania), 4:2 (January 2019), 78 pp.
Should universal health coverage include immigrants in the definition of “universal?”
Should federal taxpayers subsidize health insurance coverage for immigrants, even those who are undocumented? Should all immigrants
be required to purchase health insurance? The author of this paper answers all these questions in the affirmative and
in so doing, challenges both the cost-savings and “deservedness” arguments of restrictionists. She cites, for
example, a number of studies that suggest that cost increases, such as spikes in the cost of uncompensated emergency room
care, may partly or completely offset any gains to the system through the denial of benefits. She also fears that the ethos
of deservedness reinforces the individualistic notion that some people, whether immigrant or not, are entitled to health care
and others are not. This ethos also imposes a seemingly gratuitous punishment for lack of immigration status, above and beyond
removal from the country. The author then goes on to explicate a “health justice” framework for understanding
coverage priorities -- a philosophical orientation quite different from the “individualistic” focus that seemed
to dominate until the passage of the Affordable Care Act. Under this new framework, the starting point is not the health needs
of the individual, however important in final outcome, but the needs of the community as a whole. “The Health Justice
approach highlights evidence that disparities in access to health care do not merely affect the individuals or populations
with restricted access; they can also have negative spillover effects in the general community,” such as increasing
the threat of infectious disease, building antibiotic resistance, reducing worker productivity, and increasing wasteful spending
and transaction costs for the entire healthcare system.
Immigrants and Public Benefits: What Does the Research Say
Bipartisan Policy Center, November 2018, 18 pp.
Authors: Tim O’Shea & Cristobal Ramón
This review of studies on the use of public benefits by immigrants takes a look at research that has been done to examine
whether immigrants use public benefits at greater rates than other groups; which groups of immigrants use public benefits;
immigrants’ fiscal impacts on public benefits programs; the impact of federal and state benefits legislation on immigrants’
use of public benefits; and the impact of immigration enforcement and the complexity of benefits laws on the use of public
benefits. The report concludes that whether or not immigrants are found to have a negative or positive fiscal impact often
depends on who has conducted the research. For example, most studies find that individual immigrants use public benefits at
lower rates and at lower levels that native-born Americans. However, other studies show that immigrant-headed households —
which may include U.S.-citizen children — use public benefits at a higher rate than households headed by the native-born.
The household method tends to be favored by immigrant restrictionist groups. In another example, studies come to different
conclusions about the costs and benefits of immigrants depending on whether they measure costs and benefits in a moment in
time or over the course of many years. An immigrant household with children in local schools might be viewed as a net cost
on the one hand, but if the higher productivity, earnings, and tax payments of that educated child are factored in over the
long term, there is a net benefit to the system. The report also points out some areas where additional research would be
useful — including whether extending Medicaid and state health benefits to undocumented immigrants would save local
governments money by lowering costs associated with the provision of emergency medical care by hospitals. (Maurice Belanger,
Maurice Belanger Consulting)
Immigration as a Social Determinant of Health: Proceedings of a Workshop,
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, 2018, 64 pp.
Rapporteurs: Steve Olson
& Karen M. Anderson
These proceedings summarize discussions held at a workshop on “Immigration and
the Social Determinants of Health” held by the Roundtable on the Promotion of Health Equity of the National Academies
in October of 2017. The National Academies does not expect this type of workshop to reach a consensus, or to produce
a set of recommendations, but rather to engage in a preliminary exploration of the issue. Citing a meta-analysis on
immigration and health that was published in 2015, one conference participant noted that research on immigrant health has
largely focused on cultural practices and individual behaviors, rather than “on glaring patterns of inequality and pathogenic
conditions produced by structures of poverty, immigration policy, and heavy-handed enforcement tactics.” Another participant
suggested that pursuing comprehensive immigration reform should be considered a public health strategy because of the high
rates of depression and post-traumatic stress caused by lack of legal status and intensified deportations. The workshop included
a “world café” session featuring the work of six California organizations active in reducing health inequities:
The Alameda Health Consortium, Asian Pacific Islander Legal Outreach, the Center for Empowering Immigrants and Refugees, Centro
Legal de la Raza, Culturally Responsible Care groups at Kaiser Permanente, and Filipino Advocates for Justice.
Proposed Public Charge Rule Would Significantly Reduce Legal Admissions and Adjustment
to Lawful Permanent Resident Status of Working Class Persons,
Center for Migration
Studies, November 2018, 11 pp.
Authors: Donald Kerwin et al A proposed rule issued by the Department of Homeland Security in October 2018 would broaden
the ability of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services officers to determine that a beneficiary is inadmissible to be granted
a visa, adjust status or apply for Lawful Permanent Residence (LPR) based upon the perceived risk that the individual could
become a “public charge,” i.e. financially dependent upon the federal or state government for assistance. This
report analyzes the implications this proposed rule could have on the immigration system and discusses the impact on two populations
of immigrants that would be most affected by the change in adjudication procedure: undocumented immigrants and otherwise LPR-eligible
nonimmigrants. Under the proposed guidelines, the government would consider “all the factors bearing on the intending
immigrant’s ability or potential ability to be self-sufficient” -- a much broader standard than the one currently
in use. The new factors would include lack of current employment or history of unemployment, lack of access to private health
care, and receipt of one or more public benefits. The authors argue that the proposed DHS rule would place an undue burden
on lower-income immigrants, restrict the entry of individuals within family-based categories, and have negative ripple effects
on millions of other people both in the U.S. and in sending countries. The article concludes by estimating the number of individuals
who could be affected by the proposed rule and providing educational, economic and employment profiles of those individuals. (Mia Fasano for The Immigrant Learning Center's Public Education
Estimated Impacts of the Proposed Public Charge Rule on Immigrants and Medicaid,
Henry K Kaiser Family Foundation, October 2018, 15 pp.
Artiga et al
This brief provides an analysis of the potential impact of the Trump Administration’s proposed
rule changes regarding what types of support can be included in determinations of how likely it is for someone applying for
Legal Permanent Residency (LPR) to become a public charge at some point. Previously, housing, nutrition and health programs
(including Medicaid) had been excluded from the analysis of the applicant’s economic vulnerability. Including those
programs under the proposed rule would mean that 94 percent of non-citizens looking for LPR status would have at least one
characteristic that could lead to their application being denied. The authors suggest that in order to maintain eligibility
for LPR, non-citizen immigrants will avoid getting any support from fear of being considered a public charge. For example,
they estimate that between 2.1 to 4.9 million Medicaid enrollees would disenroll, even when there may be US born children
in the household that are eligible for services. This massive loss of healthcare will lead to worse health outcomes not only
for those who are disenrolling, but also for their families and communities. The authors also stress that this will in turn
affect housing security, educational attainment and economic productivity. In this way, perceptions of the new regulations
will be just as consequential as the rule changes themselves, and the negative impacts will not be limited to members of the
immigrant community that are the target of the law (Erik Jacobson, Montclair State University).
Detained and Denied: Healthcare Access in Immigration Detention,
New York Lawyers for the Public Interest, 2017, 20 pp.
Authors: Sola Stamm et al
As the Trump administration threatens to deport an increasing number of immigrants, immigration advocates have
expressed concern over the state of health care treatment within detention centers. The New York Lawyers for Public Interest
(NYLPI) provides legal representation and advocacy work for undocumented immigrants in ICE custody. NYPLI reports in Detained
and Denied: Healthcare Access in Immigration Detention that immigrant detention facilities often provide sub-par health
care to detained individuals and fail to provide timely and adequate medical care to accommodate the medical needs of the
incarcerated population. Under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. constitution, detained immigrants have a right to
adequate healthcare. ICE itself also has issued official "performance-based standards" for medical care. NYPLI
collected information on the state of medical care at detention facilities through a review of complaint records and interviews
with 47 individuals with serious medical conditions who were held in immigration detention in the New York metropolitan area.
The researchers found recurring deficiencies in medical care, including incomplete intake assessments, lack of interpreters
for patient-doctor communication, denied or severely delayed medical care, and inadequate departure planning for continuing
medical care. These deficiencies, the authors argue, have endangered the lives of detainees and undermined their basic human
dignity. The report concludes with a recommendation that ICE detention facilities be mandated to comply with performance standards
regarding comprehensive health care and be held legally accountable for the care of detained individuals. (Mia
Fasano for The Immigrant Learning Center)
Living in an Immigrant Family in America: How Fear and Toxic Stress are affecting Daily Life, Well-Being,
The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, December, 2017, 24 pp.
Authors: Samantha Artiga & Petry Ubri
According to this report, immigrant families from various backgrounds are living with increased fear and uncertainty
due to the current political climate. The election of Donald Trump has led to policies that increase immigration enforcement
and restrict the entry of immigrants from selected countries. These policies can potentially impact 23 million non-citizens
who live in the United States, as well as 12 million children who are predominantly U.S.-born. This Kaiser Family Foundation
brief uses focus groups with 100 immigrant parents from 15 countries as well as 13 telephone interviews with pediatricians
who serve immigrant families to understand how the political climate and enforcement policies since the 2016 presidential
election impact the daily lives and health of immigrant families. The report finds that the heightened stress many immigrant
families are experiencing can have broad effects on the life and daily routine of these families. Many immigrant parents report
difficulty in finding employment. Adults also feel insecure about their ability to stay in the U.S., and they limit their
time outside the home to reduce risk of deportation or interaction with law enforcement. Said one Latino parent, "Before,
there were many kids in the parks... but now... the kids spend more time inside these days because we are afraid of being
deported." In addition, children appear to be exposed to elevated levels of toxic stress. Parents report that their children
are experiencing more bullying at school, causing physiological, behavioral and mental health changes in children that can
lead to compromised development and poorer mental and physical health outcomes. In response to witnessing increased racism
and bullying since the 2016 election as well as changes in health care use, some pediatricians have taken steps to help immigrant
families feel safe including increasing communication to reassure confidentiality, having bilingual staff welcome families,
and writing letters to assist families facing deportation. (The Immigrant Learning Center's Public Education Institute)
Facilitating Health Communication with Immigrant, Refugee, and Migrant Populations Through the Use of
Health Literacy and Community Engagement Strategies: Proceedings of a Workshop
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2017, unpaginated
Rapporteur: Joe Alper
goal of this workshop was to identify approaches that will enable health care organizations to serve immigrant and refugee
populations "in a manner that allows all members of these communities to obtain, process, and understand basic health
information and the services needed to make appropriate health and personal decisions." This publication summarizes the
workshop's presentations and discussions, and highlights important lessons, practical strategies, and opportunities for using
the principles of health literacy to facilitate communication with newcomer populations. In accordance with the policies of
the National Academies, the workshop did not attempt to reach any conclusions or make any recommendations about needs and
future directions. Rather, it simply highlights the issues identified by speakers and workshop participants and calls attention
to programs and initiatives that show some promise of success. One important concern of participants was to earn the
trust of immigrant communities by responding to the climate of fear that surrounds immigrants today and to ensure that personal
information, if collected at all, is safeguarded. One model program is the "You are safe here" campaign of the San
Francisco Department of Public Health. Another approach is to probe more deeply into the experience of migrants, many of whom
have been tortured or have suffered other forms of trauma. As one participant said, "perhaps the most important thing
a clinician can do is to be curious and ask people about their experiences." The workshop gave examples of efforts to
address the social determinants of health, such as the work of the California Healthy Nail Salon Collaborative. Workshop
participants also learned about efforts on the part of health care organizations to partner with community-based organizations,
such as the Casa de Salud in the St. Louis metropolitan area. Finally, innovative programs to improve communication with newcomer
populations, such as the Let's Talk About Medicines project of Wisconsin Health Literacy, were described.
Pre-Migration Trauma Exposure and Mental Health Functioning among Central American Migrants Arriving
at the US Border,
PLoS One 12(1), January 10, 2017, 8 pp.
Authors: Allen Keller, Amy Joscelyne, Megan Granski, Barry Rosenfeld
In recent years, the influx of families and children from Central America arriving at the U.S. border has been
deemed an "urgent humanitarian situation." Examining how the experiences of migrants correspond with the requirements
for asylum status can powerfully inform public discourse and policy. This report focuses on migrants from the Northern
Triangle region, formed by El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, and considers their pre-migration trauma, current mental health
functioning, reasons for leaving the region, and rate at which they appeared to satisfy the legal criteria for asylum. Researchers
interviewed 234 adults seeking assistance at the Church of the Sacred Heart in McAllen, Texas and found that 83 percent of
participants cited violence as a reason for fleeing their country, 69 percent did not report violent events to the police
for fear of police corruption and gang-related retribution, and 90 percent are afraid to return to their native country. Based
on self-report symptom checklists, 32 percent of participants met the criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder, 24 percent
for depression, and 17 percent for both disorders. When considering the data against the criteria for asylum in the U.S.,
researchers found that 70 percent of the overall sample met the criteria for asylum. The findings indicate that with the high
degrees of trauma and psychological distress present in the population, the use of detention for these asylum-seekers may
be cruel and retraumatizing. (Grace Chen for The ILC Public Education Institute)
Organisational systems' approaches to improving cultural competence in healthcare: a systematic scoping
review of the literature,
International Journal for Equity in Health, 16:78 (2017), 19 pp.
Authors: Janya McCalman, Crystal Jongen, &
Noting that the scope of cultural competence has expanded beyond the interpersonal domain
to address system-level factors, the authors of this study set about to determine the evidence base for a systems approach
to eliminating inequities in health care. A systems approach "requires an amalgamation of attitudes, practices, policies
and structures to enable healthcare organizations and professionals to work effectively in culturally diverse situations."
A review of the literature from 2002 to 2015, examining health care interventions in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the
United States, produced nearly 3,000 studies touching on cultural competence in healthcare settings. However, only 141 studies
appeared to focus on systems-level approaches, and of those studies, only 15 studies included evaluation measures and were
deemed worthy of inclusion in the study. Three approaches that seemed particularly efficacious were: user engagement
in the development or implementation of strategies, organizational readiness, and delivery across multiple sites. However,
there is a clear need for additional studies in order to bolster the case for systemic approaches to cultural competence.
"...There is little guidance for healthcare organisations about how to identify what mix of cultural competence strategies
works in practice, when and how to implement them properly, or whether their investment in cultural competence interventions
will have the intended effects on client experiences or health outcomes."
Building an Organizational Response to Health Disparities: A Practical Guide to Implementing the National
National Committee for Quality Assurance, December, 2016, 59 pp.
In 2013, the federal Office of Minority
Health (OMH) issued the "enhanced" National CLAS Standards (Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services)
to guide health and health care organizations in their efforts to ensure health equity. This Toolkit, produced under OMH contract
with the National Center for Quality Assurance (NCQA), provides examples of resources available to support organizations committed
to the implementation of the CLAS standards. The toolkit is divided into four chapters that follow the organization of the
National CLAS Standards: Principal Standard; Governance, Leadership and Workforce; Communication and Language Assistance;
Engagement, Continuous Improvement and Accountability. Resources are categorized by the five groups that are likely
to experience disparities in care: people with disabilities, people with limited English proficiency, people with low
health literacy, racial/ethnic minorities, sexual and gender minorities. The LEP section of the Toolkit provides descriptions
and links to a variety of resources, including training materials and assessment tools. A panel of experts reviewed the content
of the Toolkit to ensure the quality and relevance of all materials.
Practicing Cultural Humility
American Counseling Association, Counseling Today, December 27, 2016, 6 pp.
Author: Sidney Shaw
endorses a revision to the Multicultural Counseling Competencies (MCCs) model, which has been a foundational document in the
counseling profession for several decades. The chief flaw in the model, according to Shaw, is the "self-assessment bias"
of the counselor, who typically overrates his/her abilities in relating to clients from diverse cultural backgrounds. Although
the insights of MCC remain valid, they need to be supplemented with what the author calls Multicultural Orientation (MCO).
This approach "privilege(s) the voice of clients and make(s) the counselor's own invisible privilege a little more visible."
It requires the counselor to practice "cultural humility," which involves "engag(ing) in collaborative, open
exploration with clients regarding their cultural identity as a salient factor in treatment." It also enables counselors
to practice "dynamic sizing," i.e. knowing under what circumstances to generalize cultural knowledge to specific
individuals. In addition, the approach helps to reduce the number of "microagressions" (reported by more than 50
percent of racial and ethnic minority clients). The paper concludes with a number of in-session recommendations for counselors
interested in embracing this new approach.
Ethnic Attrition and the Observed Health of Later-Generation Mexican Americans,
Institute for the Discussion of Labor, Discussion Paper No. 10062, August 8, 2016, 13 pp.
Authors: Francisca Antman,
Brian Duncan, & Stephen J. Trejo
This study suggests that there is a bias built into many studies of the
health condition of second and later generations of Mexican immigrants. These studies often show a pattern of worsening health
outcomes with each successive generation. The authors point out that there is a major flaw in these studies, in that they
rely on the reported ethnic self-identification of survey respondents. "Ethnic attrition" occurs whenever a U.S.-born
descendent of a Mexican immigrant fails to self-identify as Mexican. Such individuals "are generally more likely
to display health outcomes closer to those of non-Hispanic whites compared with individuals who identify as Mexican Americans."
The data used in this study came from the 2000-2014 waves of the National Health Interview Survey, the major source of detailed
data on a broad range of health outcomes and related characteristics of the U.S. population. Ethnic attrition rates
are greatest for children of intermarried parents.
Pursuing Health Equity through Welcoming Work
Welcoming America, 2016, 10 pp.
Authors: M. Mayor & Jennifer Drive
Pursuing Health Equity through
Welcoming Work describes replicable strategies to promote health equity as part of efforts to integrate immigrants into
community life. The report draws on key points from a Welcoming America panel discussion and uses data from governmental agencies
and scholarly research to highlight promising practices in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Virginia and New Hampshire. The authors
emphasize three key requirements for achieving health equity: involving immigrants in planning and research, overcoming social
and cultural barriers, and examining the effects of social and economic policies on health outcomes. Attention to these requirements
has led to successful initiatives at both local and state levels. In Atlanta, for instance, a health center worked with immigrant
community leaders to implement the "promotores de salud" model. Used in Latin America to raise awareness among Latinas
about reproductive health, this model has reached 11,000 community members in Atlanta. As an example of the "Health in
All Policies" approach from the American Public Health Association, New Hampshire's health equity plan promotes broader
agency partnerships to address the social determinants of health and provides periodic report cards to help identify issues
that require follow-up action. The authors advise that immigrant and refugee voices should be at the center of local and national
discussions on community health. (Jasmina Popaja for The Immigrant Learning Center Public Education Institute)
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Mental Health Care for Children and Young Adults: A National Study
International Journal of Health Services, August 12, 2016, 15 pp.
Authors: Lyndonna Marrast, David U. Himmelstein, &
This study finds that black and Latino children and young adults receive substantially less
outpatient mental health and substance abuse care than their non-minority counterparts, even when controlling for income and
health insurance status. About 5.7 percent of white children and young adults saw a mental health specialist in a single year,
compared with about 2.3 percent for black or Hispanic young people. The authors note that the prevalence of most psychiatric
conditions is similar for all three groups. Among reasons suggested by the authors for these treatment disparities are: the
stigmas associated with mental illness in some groups and the shortage of behavioral health specialists in minority communities.
The authors also suggest that the disparities in mental health treatment for blacks and Latinos lead to high rates of school
discipline, such as suspensions and expulsions, and higher incarceration rates. For example, blacks and Hispanics account
for 63 percent of children detained in juvenile facilities. "Prisons and jails," the authors argue, "have become
de facto mental institutions," and the consequences for families and communities have been devastating.
Integrating Health Literacy, Cultural Competence, and Language Access Services: Workshop Summary
National Academies, Health and Medicine Division, July 18, 2016, 96 pp.
Rapporteur: Joe Alper
"roundtable" discussion focused on important lessons, practical strategies, and opportunities for creating greater
integration of health literacy, cultural competence, and language access services in the healthcare system. Held on October
19, 2015, the workshop brought together a select group of leaders in these three fields, including academics, health care
administrators, and advocates. Sponsors of the event included various agencies with the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, as well as non-governmental organizations such as the Aetna Foundation and Eli Lilly and Company. In accordance
with the policies of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, the workshop did not attempt to reach
conclusions or make recommendations, but instead focused on the issues identified by the speakers and workshop participants.
An initial presentation by Dennis Andrulis, senior research scientist at the Texas Health Institute, was followed by a panel
discussion addressing two key questions: what are the key concepts in this area, and what three things have changed
over time to facilitate integration? Another panel featured presentations from four organizations that have made progress
in achieving this kind of integration: the National Committee for Quality Assurance, the California Pan-Ethnic Health
Network, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and Hofstra North Shore - LIJ School of Medicine. Upon conclusion of these sessions,
three breakout groups in the areas of research, policy, and services/care were formed to discuss developments and needs in
Improving Cultural Competence to Reduce Health Disparities
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), US Department of Health and Human Services, March, 2016, 91 pp +
Prepared by: Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center
In furthering its mission to improve the
quality, safety, efficiency and effectiveness of health care in the U.S., AHRQ conducts systematic reviews of health care
research to determine its strengths, limitations, and usefulness to practitioners. This review analyzed over 37,000
English-language citations dealing with the provision of "culturally appropriate health care" for racial/ethnic
minority populations, people with disabilities, and LGBT populations. Fewer than 100 studies met the rigorous standards for
inclusion in the final report. However, none of the included studies measured the effect of cultural competence interventions
on health care disparities. Most of the training interventions measured changes in professional attitudes toward the population
of interest but did not measure the downstream effect of changing provider beliefs on the care delivered to patients."
The report concludes by suggesting a new model for research that substitutes a "relational" for an "attributional"
model, i.e. instead of focusing on the internal characteristics of groups (or "culture"), which may not apply to
all members of a particular group, practitioners are urged to examine "the devaluation and exclusion of these groups
within the broader society." Another possible term for this approach, according to the authors, might be "diversity
A ‘Healthy Immigrant Effect' or a ‘Sick Immigrant Effect'? Selection and Policies Matter,
Institute for the Study of Labor, September 22, 2015, 25 pp.
F. Constant et al
The "healthy immigrant effect" refers to research showing that immigrants to the
U.S. and other countries tend to be healthier than comparable native-born populations. In this study, the researchers attempt
to tease out the reasons for this phenomenon. Using data from the Survey of Health Aging and Retirement Europe (SHARE),
the researchers compare the health status of immigrants in 16 European countries with that of immigrants in Israel. Israel
provides an intriguing and "unique" case study, as it is the only country that does not screen Jewish immigrants
by education level or health status. The study shows that immigrants to Israel have only a "fair" health status,
compared to their counterparts in Europe who are rated as "good." Compared to native Israelis, immigrants
to Israel "have also been diagnosed with major diseases, have more medical symptoms and more mobility limitations, use
more prescriptions drugs, have a higher number of hospitalizations, have lower cognitive skills, and suffer more from eyesight
problems." The researchers provide evidence that "self-selection alone does not explain the healthy immigrant
effect." Rather, the migration policy of the immigrant-receiving country may have a powerful impact on the health
status of arriving immigrants.
Creating Conditions to Support Healthy People: State Policies that Affect the Health of Undocumented
Immigrants and their Families,
UC Global Health Institute, UCLA Blum center on Poverty and Health in Latin America, UCLA
Center for Health Policy Research, 2015, 22 pp.
Authors: Michael A. Rodríguez, Maria-Elena Young, & Steven
This study attempts to rank states according to their record in promoting the health of undocumented
immigrants. The authors consider five areas to be important "social determinants of health," which they define as
"the circumstances in which people are born, grow up, live, work, and age - and that impact immigrants' ability to live
healthy lives. " The five policy areas are: the availability of public health and welfare benefits, such as children's
health insurance, prenatal care, and eligibility for SNAP; access to higher education; labor and employment practices, such
as the inclusion of undocumented workers in workers' compensation laws; the availability of driver's licenses; and state legislation
limiting participation in the federal Secure Communities enforcement program. The states with the highest scores were California
(9), Illinois (7), Washington (4), Colorado (2), and Texas (2). The states with the lowest scores were Ohio (-7), West Virginia
(-6), Mississippi (-6), Indiana (-6), Arizona, (-6) and Alabama (-6).
Improving Cultural Competence: A Treatment Improvement Protocol
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), 2014, 329 pp.
With a mission to reduce
the impact of substance abuse and mental illness, SAMSHA produces Treatment Improvement Protocols (TIPs) to provide evidence-based
and best practice guidance to clinicians, program administrators, and payers. A panel of non-federal clinical researchers,
clinicians, program administrators, and patient advocates debates their particular area of expertise until they reach a consensus
on best practices. This particular TIP explores the importance of cultural competency in treating substance abuse and mental
illness. The first chapter defines cultural competence and the rationale for pursuing it. The second chapter covers behaviors
and skills for cultivating cultural competence as well as attitudes conducive to working effectively with diverse client populations.
The third chapter discusses interviewing skills, assessment practices, and treatment planning. The fourth chapter discusses
"top-down" organizational strategies for achieving cultural competency. The fifth chapter reviews cultural knowledge
specific to individual racial and ethnic groups; and the final chapter explores the concept of "drug culture."
Implementing CLAS Standards and Improving Cultural Competency and Language Access: A Practical
Arizona Health Disparities Center, 2014, 15 pp.
is designed to promote use of the National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health and
Health Care (CLAS Standards) developed by the Office of Minority Health. Originally published in 2000, the CLAS standards
were revised in 2013. The Toolkit includes a short history of the CLAS standards movement, the rationale for their use, as
well as a side-by-side comparison of the original and revised versions of the standards. The publication also provides links
to resources useful in implementing each of the 15 standards.
Responding to Culture: Beyond Cultural Competence Training,
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, March, 2014, 14 pp.
While cultural competence
training for health care professionals may increase awareness of cultural differences and of the need to address disparities
in health outcomes, it is not enough to produce real results. This is one conclusion of a national program of the Robert Wood
Johnson Foundation that funded 33 organizations to examine intervention to reduce health disparities with particular focus
on diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and depression. Entitled "finding Answers: Disparities Research for Change,"
the program evaluated strategies used in a variety of health care settings to determine what works - and what does not - to
improve prevention and care. This report summarizes the main conclusions of this research and urges four broad "strategies
for considering culture" as an integral aspect of quality improvement in health care. First, gather as much information
about patients' culture through patient and community input; second, build interventions based on patients' culturally-based
values, preferences, and perceptions; third, create patient educational materials with images and language that resonate
with the target population; and fourth, ensure sustainability of the overall effort especially during periods of staff turnover
or changes in the patient population. The report includes many practical examples of these strategies in action.
The website of Finding Answers has descriptions of the funded projects, as well as summaries of the published research
produced by them.
Hispanic Community Health Study Data Book: A Report to the Communities
U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute,
September, 2013, 58 pp.
Described as "the largest health study of Hispanic/Latino populations in
the United States," this publication presents data from 16,415 Hispanic adults recruited from a random sample of
households in the Bronx, Chicago, Miami, and San Diego between 2008 and 2011. Participants were given the opportunity to self-identify
as Cuban, Dominican, Puerto Rican, Mexican, Central American, or South American and health measures were reported accordingly.
Participants were selected to be representative of the local population rather than the broader U.S. population. Although
almost 80 percent of participants were born in other countries or Puerto Rico, the data does not differentiate between native-born
and foreign-born Hispanics. The primary purpose of the study was to identify the factors "that may have a protective
or harmful role in the development of cardiovascular disease..." The study found that prediabetes, diabetes, and obesity
were "very common" among Hispanics, with one out of three participants with diabetes unaware of having the disease.
The study also examined the prevalence of hypertension, smoking, depression and anxiety, sleep problems, and hearing problems.
Lifestyle factors such as diet and physical activity were also examined.
The Affordable Care Act & Mixed-Status Families: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs),
National Immigration Law Center (NILC), October, 2013, 7 pp
NILC answers sixteen FAQs about
how the Affordable Care Act (ACA) affects mixed-status families in the U.S. The report defines a mixed-status family as "a
household made up of individuals with different citizenship or immigration statuses." Many of these families are
unsure if and/or how they can access health insurance through the ACA without putting their undocumented family members at
risk. Under the ACA "only U.S. citizens and people who are ‘lawfully present'" are eligible for health insurance.
However, ineligible (i.e. undocumented) family members may complete an application on behalf of an eligible family member
without being required to reveal their immigration status and risk apprehension. "The ACA codifies longstanding federal
guidance, known as the Tri-Agency Guidance, which...ensure[s] that applications do not require unnecessary information from
nonapplicants, because these inquiries deter eligible people from securing benefits for which they may be eligible."
Therefore, any information provided on ACA applications, NILC advises, "will not be used by U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE)." NILC also encourages family members to apply for Medicaid or CHIP on behalf of eligible family
Is the United States Bad for Children's Health? Risk and Resilience among Young Children of
Migration Policy Institute (MPI), July, 2013, 28 pp.
Authors: Jennifer Van Hook, Nancy Landale, & Marianne
The authors wrote this paper for a health policy symposium convened by MPI in January
of 2013. The goal of the symposium was to "frame the major policy and practice issues affecting children (birth through
age 10) with immigrant parents." As childhood health disparities are associated with delays in cognitive development
and poor integration outcomes later in life, an examination of the health status of these children may have important public
policy implications. This paper reviews the available research on health outcomes for immigrant children, with particular
focus on the children of Mexican immigrants, who experience greater health risks than most other children. Although
the so-called "epidemiological paradox," i.e. the lower prevalence of several health conditions, such as allergies,
asthma and learning disabilities, among the children of immigrants, is well-documented, new data is "paint(ing) a considerably
more nuanced picture," especially when you dig down to the level of national origin groups. Like other children with
immigrant parents, children of Mexican parents, particularly those from lower socio-economic backgrounds, show a lower incidence
of asthma; however, Mexican children with the disease are "highly disadvantaged in access to high-quality care for chronic
health conditions." Mexican children also have the highest prevalence of obesity among all racial/ethnic groups in the
U.S. The authors review four factors that help to explain the poor health outcomes of children of Mexican immigrants: limited
English proficiency of many parents, low socioeconomic status of many families, parental legal status, and the dispersion
of Mexican immigrants to new destinations where they may be viewed with resentment and suspicion. The authors conclude that
the fate of these children may "stand at a crossroads." As children of immigrants now make up almost one-quarter
of all children, "promoting the health of children in immigrant families will maximize the long-term well-being and productivity
of tomorrow's adults."
Health Care for Immigrant Families: Current Policies and Issues
Migration Policy Institute, June, 2013, 19 pp.
Authors: Leighton Ku & Mariellen Jewers
This report assesses how the current health care system in the U.S. addresses the health care
needs of immigrants. Debunking the myth that immigrants abuse health care services, the report finds that immigrants, even
when covered by public or private insurance, see doctors less frequently and use emergency rooms at a lower rate than the
native-born. Low-income, immigrant children with private insurance, for instance, were significantly less likely to visit
a doctor's office in 2010 than low-income, native-born children at 44 percent versus 69 percent. Similarly, only 17 percent
of publicly insured (Medicaid or Medicare), low-income, immigrant adults overall visited an emergency room versus 25 percent
of low-income, native-born adults. Among uninsured adults, the rate was six percent for immigrants and 14 percent of the native-born.
Although low levels of insurance coverage (both public and private) does in part account for low utilization of health care
by immigrants, there are other reasons as well, including language barriers, cultural differences, and worries over whether
utilization will lead to deportation or revocation of legal status. The authors recommend that federal and state governments
expand Medicaid access to legal permanent residents; support non-profit, community health centers; and increase access to
interpreters. (Denzil Mohammed)
Cultural Competence in Health Literacy Primer,
Maryland Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities & University of Maryland School of Public Health, March, 2013,
Authors: Monica McCann, Olivia Carter-Pokras, Bonnie Braun, & Carlessia A. Hussein
In 2012, Maryland enacted a law requiring attention to cultural competency and health literacy in the curricula
of health profession degree programs. This primer is intended to help health educators, students, and practicing health
professionals learn how to reduce health disparities and improve health outcomes through culturally-sensitive and effective
communication with patients across the various health disciplines. The primer is unique in merging the fields of health literacy
and cultural competence, which are usually treated separately and often compete for time in already tight curricula. The primer
consists of six modules of instruction: health disparities, community strategies, bias and stereotyping, effective communication
skills, use of interpreters, and self-reflection and culture of health professions. Within each module, learning objectives
are listed by type of competency (K = knowledge; S = skill; and A = attitude), as well as by learning stage (novice, intermediate,
and advanced). The primer is a work in progress. Revisions will be made as new resources are identified for specific learning
objectives and as existing resources undergo standardized review.
National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services (CLAS) in Health and Health
Care: A Blueprint for Advancing and Sustaining CLAS Policy and Practice,
Office of Minority Health (OMH), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, April, 2013, 191 pp.
developed by OMH in 2000, the national CLAS Standards have been widely circulated and implemented. In 2010, OMH launched a
project to update the Standards to reflect growth in the field of cultural competency and increasing diversity in the nation.
The new Standards emerged out of an extensive consultation process with stakeholders and experts, many of whom recommended
clarification as to the Standards' intention, terminology, and implementation strategies. The Standards now reflect a broader
and more inclusive definition of culture, encompassing racial/ethnic, linguistic, religious/spiritual, sociological, and biological
markers of difference. The Standards are also directed toward a broader audience than the original Standards, including policy
makers and legislators, accrediting and credentialing agencies, educators, and community-based organizations. The 15 standards
are grouped into three categories: (1) Governance, Leadership, and Workforce; (2) Communication and Language Assistance;
and (3) Engagement, Continuous Quality Improvement, and Accountability. This publication contains both the standards
and a "blueprint" for the implementation of each standard. The Blueprint explains the purpose and components
of each standard, along with model implementation practices and useful resources. The Standards themselves are also available
in a separate file.
Information on Small Populations with
Significant Health Disparities: A Report on Data Collected on the Health of Asian Americans in Massachusetts,
Institute for Asian American Studies,
University of Massachusetts (Boston), November, 2012, 48 pp.
Authors: Carolyn Wong, Hannah Hosotani, & John Her
How can data collection procedures be improved to capture information on Asian populations with significant health disparities?
Hoping that the State of Massachusetts might become a model for the country, the authors offer a number of recommendations
to public authorities and private health care organizations. One is to conduct health surveys in local communities where many
Asian Americans live. Another is to use categories that reflect "sensitivity to ordinary people's understandings"
of their primary identity, which may not be "Asian." Another is to use interviewers speaking the languages of Asian
populations, so that findings are not biased towards fluent English-speakers. And finally, academic researchers should partner
with community-based organizations, especially those working in low-wage Asian communities, to gain access to hard-to-reach
Maximizing Health Care Reform for New York's Immigrants,
New York Immigration Coalition, Empire Justice
Center, & NYS Health Foundation,
February, 2013, 41 pp.
This paper contains a set of recommendations
on how New York can maximize the inclusion of immigrants in health care reform. The authors also devote special attention
to immigrants left out of federal reform. The paper is divided into five major sections: eligibility of non-citizens to participate
in New York's Health Benefit Exchange; documentation and verification requirements; marketing and outreach to immigrant communities;
community input and monitoring; and maintaining safety net services for the residual uninsured population. In developing these
recommendations, researchers undertook a review of the literature; conducted in-depth interviews with stakeholders and experts;
and analyzed the experience of three early-adopter states: Massachusetts, California, and Maryland. The authors hope that
the report will serve as a "blueprint" for advocates in working with state and local government partners on health
care reform, and that "New York can pave the way nationally as a model of immigrant inclusion."
Promoting appropriate use of physicians' non-English language skills in clinical care: Recommendations for policymakers, organizations and clinicians,
American Medical Association, 2013, 18 pp.
Authors: Marsha Regenstein, Ellie Andres, &
Produced by the Commission to End Health Care Disparities, an umbrella group consisting of more
than 70 state and specialty medical societies, this report seeks to improve the quality of communication and care given by
bilingual physicians, who may have varying levels of ability in one or more non-English languages. While nearly nine
out of ten hospitals report using bilingual providers to treat limited English proficient (LEP) patients, very few evaluate
their competence in non-English languages in any careful and systematic way. As there are a number of groups in the
process of development assessment tools for this purpose, the Commission seeks to encourage these efforts and to capture the
consensus of stakeholders on effective strategies for reducing disparities in treatment and health outcome due to language
barriers. The report provides separate recommendations for clinicians, healthcare organizations, and policy makers. Among
the recommendations for policy makers are: creating tools to assess and improve use of clinicians' non-English language skills,
developing payment models to cover the cost of interpreter services, and collecting and recording patients' language needs
at initial point of service. Health care organizations are urged to provide training to staff on how to work with interpreters
and to bring interpreters into clinical care teams. Finally, the Commission encourages physicians to use their bilingual
skills with patients "whenever doing so is safe and effective." In order to make this determination, physicians
may wish to ask a trained interpreter "to audit a handful of patient encounters and provide feedback on the quality of
the communication." Finally, the Commission proposes a research agenda to clarify outstanding issues, including developing
and testing "affordable and accessible (language) assessment tools for bilingual physicians and other health professionals
providing care to patients with LEP." (Lorin Mordecai)
Discharge, Deportation, and Dangerous Journeys: A Study on the Practice of Medical Repatriation,
Center for Social Justice (Seton Hall Law School) & New York Lawyers for the Public Interest, December, 2012, 55
Authors: Pyo lee, Erica Sibley, Todd Tolin, & Sarah Vader Woud
This study reviews almost
1,000 cases of forced or coerced medical repatriation, defined as the decision of a hospital to return a critically injured
or ill immigrant patient back to his/her native country without consent. Often the quality of care available to these
patients is inferior, family members and support networks are missing, and patients suffer and die. According to the authors,
the frequency of such cases will likely increase under the Affordable Care Act by reducing the pool of Medicaid Disproportionate
Share Hospital (DSH) payments and by excluding an estimated 4.3 million undocumented immigrants from coverage. By tolerating
coerced repatriation, the United States is violating its obligations under international human rights agreements. Moreover,
hospitals are, in effect, preempting the authority of the federal government to deport individuals and denying them due process.
In addition, hospitals often fail to inform immigrant patients of the immigration consequences of repatriation, which may
include a 10-year bar on reentry to the United States. The report includes many case histories and provides a series of recommendations
to the U.S. Congress, HHS, the Department of State, hospitals, states, state courts, and community groups and advocates, designed
to prevent the proliferation of this practice.
Black and Immigrant: Exploring the Effects of Ethnicity and Foreign-Born Status on Infant Health,
Migration Policy Institute, September, 2012, 21 pp.
This study challenges earlier research suggesting
"superior" birth outcomes among immigrant mothers when compared to their native born counterparts. Most immigrant
birth-outcome studies were based on data derived primarily from Mexican immigrant mothers. Using 2000-2003 data from
the National Center for Health Statistics, this study compares the prenatal behaviors and birth outcomes (preterm birth, low
birth weight, and small for gestational age) of non-Hispanic Black immigrant mothers to those of non-Black immigrants and
both Black and non-Black US-born mothers. The findings indicate that Black foreign-born mothers show a slight health advantage
over Black US-born mothers, and the author suggests that lifestyle choices among Black immigrant mothers, such as lower rates
of smoking, may play a role in better birth outcomes when compared to their US-born counterparts. However, the author notes
a lower likelihood among foreign-born Black mothers of beginning prenatal care during the first trimester when compared across
all groups. The study also finds that the health advantages of Black immigrant mothers disappear when compared to most
non-black foreign-born mothers, mirroring the "infant-health gap observed among US-born Black and non-Hispanic white
mothers." The author suggests that these disparities have a wider implication for the health of the overall Black population
residing within the US, and calls for further research to investigate the "socioeconomic mechanisms" behind these
inequities. (Dan McNulty)
the Delivery of Health Care: Eliminating Health Disparities through a Culturally & Linguistically Centered Integrated
Health Care Approach: Consensus Statements and Recommendations,
Office of Minority Health (OMH) & Hogg Foundation for Mental health, June, 2012, 28 pp.
is the fourth in a series of OMH-sponsored reports addressing the mental health needs of underserved populations. This
report grew out of a two-day expert panel meeting in 2011 looking at "the integration of behavioral health and primary
care services for racial and ethnic minority populations and those with limited English proficiency." A companion
technical report reviewing the literature on integrated approaches was also prepared. Among the key elements of such
an integrated approach are: the deployment of an integrated care team, consisting of multi-disciplinary and cross-trained
practitioners in both physical health and behavioral health; use of a single patient health and behavioral health history;
and development of unified treatment plan. The report recommends specific strategies to enhance cultural and linguistic competence
at the individual, community, practice, system, and workforce levels.These strategies are illustrated with examples of how
specific organizations have utilized these strategies in real world settings.
Community-Defined Solutions for Latino Mental Health Care Disparities,
UC Davis Center for Reducing Health Disparities, 2012, 79 pp.
In order to reduce mental
health disparities in minority populations, the California Department of Mental Health (Office of Multicultural Services)
launched the California Reducing Disparities Project, which established five Strategic Planning Workgroups (SPWs) to study
the following populations: African Americans, Asian/Pacific Islanders, Latinos, LGBTQ, and Native Americans. Funding for the
project was provided by Proposition 63, better known as the Mental Health Services Act, passed by the California voters in
2004. With staff support provided by the UC Davis Center, the 15-member Latino SPW got off the ground in 2009, quickly followed
by the creation of a stakeholder group called the California Latino Mental Health Concilio. The goal of the project
was to identify "community-defined, strength-based promising practices, models, resources, and approaches that may be
used as strategies to reduce disparities in mental health." The report's conclusions were shaped by input from
more than 550 Latinos who participated in community forums conducted in 13 cities and two high schools throughout the state.
According to the authors, this study is "the first of its kind to use a community-based, grassroots approach to identify
barriers and seek solutions to mental health care needs in historically unserved or underserved Latino communities."
Stressors associated with immigration, undocumented status, and poverty receive considerable attention in the study.
Based on evidence gathered from community informants and a literature review, the study recommends six "core strategies"
and seven "strategic directions" for adoption by stakeholders. The study concludes with capsule summaries of 16
programs in California that satisfy its seven-point criteria for being listed as promising in nature.
Health Care and the Illegal Immigrant,
Georgetown University Law Center, March, 2012, 60 pp.
Seeking to "steer a middle
course between the rhetorical extremes of the health care and immigration debates," the author of this article, Patrick
J. Glen, examines two questions in depth: first, whether unauthorized immigrants have a legal or constitutional
claim to health benefits when they lack status in a country; and second, whether there are compelling economic and public
health reasons for providing such benefits. The first section of the article discusses constitutional precedents relevant
to the legal question both in the Canadian and U.S. contexts, including a lengthy discussion of the 2010 Toussaintdecision
by the Canadian Federal Court barring an unauthorized immigrant from accessing the Canadian health care system. The author
concludes that deference to the authority of legislatures to set limits on alien access to benefits is a precedent that will
be hard to overturn. However, "under the U.S. Constitution and Canadian Charter no provision mandates that public coverage
be extended to illegal immigrants, but nothing forbids that choice as a matter of policy." And here the author
feels there are persuasive arguments for providing coverage, including the counterintuitive idea that such coverage would
actually lower costs to the overall healthcare system. Unauthorized immigrants, who are relatively healthier and younger than
the general population, would increase the risk pool for insurance, thereby helping to subsidize the sick. Moreover, by using
more preventive services, unauthorized immigrants would drive down the cost of more expensive emergency room and acute care
services. Finally, the author suggests that extending health care benefits to this population would contribute to public health
generally by allowing all people to have access to primary care, thereby reducing the threat of infection and contagious disease.
Language Proficiency and Health Status: Are Bilingual Immigrants Healthier?
(Article available by subscription only), Stanford University and Rice University, March, 2012, 36 pp.
in English fluency are often associated with progress in acculturation and improved health for immigrant populations in the
United States. However, as English fluency increases, native language fluency may decrease, producing possible negative
effects on both physical and mental health. This article seeks to examine the effect of both English and native language
fluency, or simultaneously maintaining native language fluency while increasing English language fluency, on self-rated physical
and mental health for immigrant populations. The authors examine the effect of language proficiency while controlling
for mediating variables such as socioeconomic status, family and social supports, stress, discrimination, age at migration,
and country of origin. Findings indicate that those who are bilingual, or proficient in both their native and English
languages, report better health on both physical and mental health self-rated scales, as compared to those who are native
language dominant or English language dominant. These findings are consistent with other studies on biculturalism, that
indicate that those who simultaneously maintain strong ethnic identities while also acculturating into their host society
show improved psychosocial well-being. (Patricia Lundgren)
Implementation Guidance on Data Collection Standards for Race, Ethnicity, Sex, Primary Language,
and Disability Status,
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office
of Minority Health, October, 2011, 10 pp.
After a careful review, with more than 400 public comments on
draft standards, HHS adopted final data standards for race, ethnicity, sex, primary language and disability status. The new
standards permit the collection and analysis of data about ethnic groups within the broader Hispanic, Asian, and Pacific
Islander populations. The standards are designed to reveal disparities in health status among people in specific groups, whose
conditions are often masked in current data collection practices, and to facilitate the development of targeted interventions
to reduce these disparities. The new standards were required under Section 4302 of the Affordable Care Act.
Addressing Health Disparities and Health Literacy Challenges in the South Asian Community:
Conference (October 9, 2010) Summary Report and Recommendations
South Asian Total Health Initiative, UMDNJ, and other sponsors, June, 2011, 28 pp.
This report provides detailed
summaries of all conference plenary and workshop sessions. The conference drew 126 participants, including 28 faculty members.
Plenary sessions dealt with the meaning and significance of health literacy in multicultural communities, the state of current
research on the subject of health disparities in South Asian communities, and innovative models for reaching these communities.
Three workshops focused on health disparities in diabetes, cancer, and tuberculosis. Another three workshops discussed innovative
strategies to address health disparities, including complementary and alternative medicine, chronic disease management, and
the development of multimedia solutions for health promotion. The report concludes with a series of recommendations relating
to policy planning and resource development, data collection and research, community education and professional training,
and networking and partnerships.
Assuring Health Equity for Minority Persons with Disabilities: A Statement of Principles and
U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services Advisory Committee on Minority Health
(ACMH), July, 2011, 17 pp
This is the third in a series of reports by ACMH designed to ensure that health care
reform responds to the needs of vulnerable populations. While people with disabilities experience worse health outcomes
than the general population, the report finds that "minorities with disabilities are doubly burdened by their minority
status." The report makes five recommendations: first, raise awareness about the health inequities experiences by persons
with disabilities, especially minorities; second, improve care and treatment by devoting attention to "the
culturally specific differences among people with disabilities, and among subgroups of that population;" third,
require cultural competency for all health care providers and professionals; fourth, improve research and practice on
disabilities in minority populations; and fifth, strengthen the health care workforce to ensure high quality care for people
Educating Clinicians About Cultural Competence and Disparities in Health and Health Care (Abstract
Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 2011, 12 pp.
Authored by Robert C. Like,
Professor and Director of the Center for Healthy Families and Cultural Diversity, UMDNJ, this paper outlines the role that
the continuing medical education (CME) profession can play in reducing disparities in service access and health outcomes.
The paper reviews CME initiatives in cultural competency around the country, discusses the reaction of medical professionals
to them, and makes a series of thoughtful recommendations to improve their effectiveness. Among these recommendations are
the development of "a new type of ‘participatory CME' through active engagement and collaboration with patients,
consumers, and advocates as the ‘faculty experts'..." and greater use of social media to facilitate on-going communication
on cultural competency among medical professionals.
National Standards for Healthcare Interpreter Training Programs,
on Interpreting in Health Care, April, 2011, 38 pp.
The publication of these standards culminates a two-year
process, involving a review of existing training curricula, consultation with an expert advisory committee, the convening
of ten focus groups, and online surveys seeking feedback on draft standards. The standards are intended to apply to
all preparatory training programs regardless of their duration or sponsorship. They cover core content to be mastered before
an aspiring interpreter begins professional work in the field. More demanding areas of healthcare interpreting, such
as proficiency in simultaneous interpreting, are omitted from the standards because they may be addressed in advanced training.
In addition to content standards in such areas as modes of interpreting, message conversation, and interpreting ethics,
the document also outlines a set of recommended instructional strategies, as well as guidelines for program design and
operation. The Council recommends some flexibility in implementing the standards for speakers of "languages of
National Immigration Policy and Access to Health Care: A Position Paper,
American College of Physicians (ACP), 2011, 18 pp.
ethics and mindful of legal requirements under EMTALA (Emergency Treatment and Active Labor Act), the ACP -- the nation's
largest medical specialty society representing 130,000 internists -- developed this position paper to voice concerns over
"unsustainable" policies limiting immigrant access to health care. The College, for example, opposes provisions
of the Affordable Care Act barring undocumented immigrants from paying out-of-pocket for health insurance coverage. The College
also opposes any effort to require physicians to report on the legal status of their patients. The College also laments the
low levels of insurance coverage for the U.S. born children of immigrants, many of whose parents refrain from seeking coverage
for their children out of fear of possible deportation. Another issue of concern to ACP is the absence of testing for communicable
diseases, and low levels of vaccinations, among undocumented immigrants - gaps in the health care system that threaten the
health status of all Americans. Finally, ACP urges the federal government to strengthen the network of safety-net health
care facilities around the country that provide primary care for the poor and uninsured.
The Health of the Newest New Jerseyans: A Resource Guide,
Center for Health Statistics, Office of Policy & Strategic Planning,
NJ Dept. of Health and Senior Services, February, 2011, 72 pp.
This report provides detailed information on
the health status of foreign-born residents of New Jersey. With the exception of infectious disease and HIV/AIDS, where nativity
data is lacking, the report covers a wide array of illnesses, such as heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and cancer, and provides
incidence data both by race/ethnicity and by nativity. Most comparisons are between native-born and foreign-born in
broad racial/ethnic categories, i.e. Black, White, Hispanic, and Asian. Health outcomes for specific national groups are not
given, even though the report notes that "each foreign-born group comes to the U.S. with its own health advantages and
health disadvantages." In general, "overall health outcomes for the foreign-born for many leading causes of mortality
and morbidity are quite favorable." However, the longer the period of residence in the United States, the more
the foreign-born appear to resemble the native-born. "As time spent in the United States increases, nativity differences
in health diminish."
Culturally Effective Care ToolkitAdvancing Effective Communication, Cultural Competence,
and Patient-and Family-Centered Care: A Roadmap for Hospitals,
American Academy of Pediatrics, 2011, 22 pp.
The Academy describes this publication as
a "practical, hands-on resource to help practicing pediatricians and their office staff provide culturally effective
care to their patients and families." The toolkit provides short summaries of key issues, such as health beliefs
and practices, nutritional questions, child development and mental health norms, interpretive services, and health literacy.
The toolkit includes a selected listing of supplemental tools and resources in each area.
The Joint Commission, August, 2010, 93 pp
This report culminates a multi-year project of The Joint Commission to develop new accreditation
standards for hospitals for addressing the language and communication needs of diverse patient populations. This publication
provides guidance to hospitals in complying with the new standards. Each of six chapters covers a separate component on the
continuum of care: admission, assessment, treatment, end-of-life care, discharge and transfer, and organizational readiness.
The report urges hospitals to "embed effective communication, cultural competence, and patient- and family-centered care
practices into (their) core activities," rather than viewing them as stand-alone initiatives. Copies of the old and new
standards are included in the appendices to the publication, along with explanations as to why particular standards were revised.
The new standards were approved in December 2009 and released to the field in January 2010. They will be published in the
2011 hospital accreditation manual, initiating a pilot implementation phase. Full implementation is expected to occur in 2012.
A System of Care Team Guide to Implementing Cultural and Linguistic Competence(CLC),
Technical Assistance Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health, July, 2010, 14 pp.
offers practical suggestions as to how local communities can organize to deliver culturally and linguistically competent mental
health care. It discusses the role and compensation of the CLC Coordinator; budgeting suggestions for CLC; the
role of the CLC committee; the importance of the CLC plan; and examples of how all staff members and community partners
can contribute to the goal of CLC. The Guide provides links to many tools and templates, including a sample CLC coordinator
position description, suggested hiring tips, and a CLC budget spreadsheet. The Partnership operates under contract with the
federal Child, Adolescent and Family Branch, Center for Mental Health Services (SAMHSA), U.S. Dept. of Health and Human
The High Costs of Language Barriers in Medical Malpractice,
National Health Law Program & School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, 2010,
This study analyzed 35 closed claims of medical malpractice based on inadequate language assistance.
The claims were against a single insurer operating in four states in the West. All claims were adjudicated between 2005
and 2009. Major themes in the cases included the following: "failure to provide competent oral interpretation; failure
to provide written translations of important documents, e.g. informed consent forms and discharge instructions; inadequate
documentation; and allegations of discrimination." The insurance carrier paid out over $5 million in damages, settlements,
and legal fees on the 35 cases.
What's in a Word? A Guide to Understanding Interpreting and Translation in Health Care,
National Health Law Program in cooperation with NCIHC and ATA, April, 2010, 27 pp.
guide is designed to clarify the differences and commonalities between interpreting and translation, to identify the skill
sets required for each, to identify standards of practice, to review progress towards national certification, to define the
role and functions of the interpreter and translator, and to summarize the modes and methods of interpreting and translation.
A final section of the guide discusses procedures for hiring interpreters and translators.
Confronting Inequities in Latino Health Care, Special Issue of the Journal of General Internal Medicine,
Abstracts and links to in-depth news releases on each article, October, 2009, 4 pp.
An important theme of this series of articles is that the country
of birth and immigration status of Latinos affect the quality of health care they receive in the U.S. The nine studies examine
topics such as rates of hypertension, diabetes, health insurance coverage, discrimination, quality of care, and spiritual
beliefs. Predictably, lack of insurance and undocumented status are associated with poor health outcomes. The authors argue
for attention to the needs of the Latino population in the current health care reform debate.
Moving to the Land of Milk and Cookies: Obesity among the Children of Immigrants,
Migration Policy Institute, Sept., 2009, 8 pp
Based on a federal longitudinal study of
21,000 children from kindergarten to 8th grade, 25% of whom were children of immigrants, this study concludes that
children of immigrants are a high-risk group for obesity, and that poverty doesn’t fully explain their vulnerability.
Obesity cuts across all socio-economic levels, but tends to be higher among boys, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic whites. By 8th
grade, 49% of immigrant boys were obese or overweight, compared to 33% of native-born. The authors speculate as to causes,
e.g. "many immigrants originate from countries in which food insecurity and stunting pose significant health risks to
children, so they may be unaccustomed to protecting children from the opposite problem that comes from overeating."
The Health and Cognitive Growth of Latino Toddlers: At Risk or Immigrant Paradox?
Bruce Fuller et al, Maternal and Child Health Journal, June 25,
2009, 14 pp.
Looking primarily at Mexican immigrant mothers, most living in households earning $25,000 or less
annually and with limited educational backgrounds, the authors of this study explore the causes and consequences of "the
immigrant paradox," i.e. the fact that Mexican and other Latino immigrant newborns display robust birth weight and low
mortality compared to whites and African-Americans. The study finds that these early advantages do not persist over
time. Instead, these children at 24 months of age display higher rates of obesity and asthma and lagging cognitive development.
These results have important implications for federal policy makers interested in designing effective intervention strategies.
State Practices in Health Coverage for Immigrants: A Report for New Jersey,
Rutgers Center for State Health Policy, June, 2009, 29 pp.
report surveys the landscape of health coverage for immigrants in New Jersey. Although New Jersey provides more public coverage
and safety net programs for immigrants than most other states, New Jersey appears to lag behind other states with large immigrant
populations in its outreach and enrollment success. The report contains descriptions of outreach strategies employed in California,
Illinois, Massachusetts, and New York, and concludes that "culturally-attuned outreach efforts and improved enrollment
processes" will be "critical factors in the success of any public program to cover immigrants and their children."
An earlier CSHP reportprovided esimates of children and parents without health insurance in New Jersey, including non-citizens.
NJ FamilyCare Outreach, Enrollment and Retention Report,
Submitted by the Outreach, Enrollment and Retention Working Group in Response
to the New Jersey Health Care Reform Act of 2008, NJ Office of the Child Advocate, May, 2009, 32 pp + appendices
under a provision of the NJ Health Care Reform Act of 2008, this Working Group was charged with developing a plan to improve
outreach to low and moderate income families eligible to participate in NJ FamilyCare. One of the subcommittees of the Working
Group examined the challenge of "Overcoming Barriers to Immigrant and Minority Access" (OBIMA).
The report contains numerous recommendations, either building on existing initiatives or employing new approaches based on successful
outreach strategies used in other states. The report also emphasizes collaboration among various departments of state government, such
as the Department of Education which tracks the location of limited English proficient students in local school
districts, and urges expanded use of incentives to community-based organizations to enroll uninsured individuals.
Improving Access to Language Services in Health Care: A Look at National and State Efforts,
Policy Brief, Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., April, 2009, 10 pp.
policy brief focuses on the three states that have been most active in legislating access to language services in health care:
California, Minnesota, and New York. The authors discuss the history and scope of various legislative initiatives in those
states. They also identify key challenges facing states and stakeholders seeking to develop language services, including setting
up information technology systems to support the collection and management of data on primary language, promoting appropriate
use of language services by clinical staff, ensuring the quality of language services, and developing payment mechanisms for
The State of Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Health in California Report,
A report from the California Asian Pacific
Islander Joint Legislative Caucus, Prepared by the University of California Asian American Pacific Islander Policy Multi-Campus
Research Program, Health Work Group, April, 2009, 67 pp.
By disaggregating California's Asian American Pacific
Islander group, comprising over 14% of the state's population, into some of its many ethnic sub-groups, and investigating
the health characteristics of each group, this report sheds important light on the health needs of particular communities
and appropriate policy responses to those needs. Koreans and Vietnamese, for example, have uninsured rates higher than the
state average. Filipinos have high obesity and smoking rates. Childhood asthma rates are highest among South Asians. Vietnamese
experience mental distress at higher rates than other groups. The authors urge further efforts to disaggregate other communities,
particularly the South Asian category, into Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and Sri Lankan sub-groups.
More than Words Toolkit Series,
series of 7 short publications outline the requirements for effective document translation, a process often approached haphazardly
and without full understanding of its complexity. Tool One (Getting Started with Translations in Health Care) lays out the basic
steps in the process, cautions against use of unqualified bilingual staff as translators, and emphasizes the importance of
document meaning, context and purpose, as opposed to "word-for-word replacement operations." Tool Three (Developing the Translation Brief: Why and How) describes how to provide formal instructions
for the translator, based in part on an analysis of potential "source culture bias" in the original document. Tool Six (Assessing Translation - A Manual for Requesters) outlines a tested procedure for
evaluating the quality of translations.
A Comprehensive Framework and Preferred Practices for Measuring and Reporting Cultural Competency,
National Quality Forum, April, 2009, Public Version, 11 pp.
an attempt to "bring the cultural competency movement to the next level," the National Quality Forum (NQF), a broad-based
coalition of stakeholders in the healthcare industry dedicated to the definition and measurement of quality care, has produced
this "comprehensive framework – a road map – for measuring and reporting cultural competency." The framework
consists of four guiding principles, and 45 endorsed practices within seven domains: leadership, integration into management
systems and operations, patient-provider communication, care delivery and supporting mechanisms, workforce diversity and training,
community engagement, and data collection. The framework is intended for all healthcare organizations, but has applicability
to the broader human service field. The significance of this document is that NQF standards become the primary standards used
to measure the quality of healthcare in the United States. Full report is available by purchase only.
Webinars on Language Access in Health Care,
Polyglot Systems, 2008-2009.
A for-profit language technology provider for health care organizations, Polyglot Systems has produced a series
of five free webinars on the subject of language access for hospital patients. Each webinar features national experts in the
field. Among the topics covered are: language and cultural barriers in health care: a growing crisis (September 18,
2008), leveraging data to improve the quality and availability of language services (November 18, 2008), using technology
to improve language access (December 9, 2008), the Prolingua platform for hospital admissions and patient instructions (January
9, 2009), and funding sources for language services (April 1, 2009).
Undocumented Immigrants in New Jersey's State and County Psychiatric Hospitals,
New Jersey Department of the Public Advocate, February, 2009, 11 pp.
This report examines the plight of 55 undocumented immigrants in state psychiatric hospitals,
deemed medically ready for release into less costly residential health care facilities but who cannot be placed into such
facilities because of their lack of eligibility for federal benefits. In some instances, patients were in (or eligible for)
legal status at one time, but lacked the capacity to file the necessary legal papers. Among the recommendation in this report
are the assignment of staff to work exclusively with this population and the possible establishment of a state-funded community
placement option for such patients, which might prove more cost effective than prolonged hospital stays.
Robert Like, MD, et al, "Educating Physicians to Provide Culturally
Competent, Patient-Centered Care,"
Perspectives (New Jersey Association of Family Physicians), Summer, 2008, 11 pp.
In 2005, the New Jersey legislature
passed a law requiring all physicians to complete cultural competency training as a condition of re-licensure and mandating
the inclusion of such training in the curriculum of New Jersey medical schools. This article reviews the requirements of the
law, as well as related legislation elsewhere in the United States One of the six required New Jersey training areas
deals with techniques for overcoming language barriers, including best practices in working with interpreters. The article
features a extensive listing of web-based continuing education and professional development courses in cultural competence
in health care.
Cultural and Linguistic Competence Implementation Guide,
Technical Assistance Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health, January, 2008, 116 pp.
this Guide, the Child, Adolescent and Family Branch of the Center for Mental Health Services (SAMHSA) noted that the mental
health field "has changed little" since the 1989 release of Towards a Culturally Competent System of Care,
and that "there is still only limited understanding of how to operationalize cultural competence." The Guide is
organized around six domains: governance and organizational structure; services and supports; planning and continuous
quality improvements; collaboration; communication; and workforce development. Within each domain, the Guide provides specific
implementation strategies and related performance indicators, along with examples of best practices in the field. The major
premise of this Guide is that Cultural and Linguistic Competence (CLC) must be infused through every aspect of the mental
health system of care. "This requires transformation at the policy, administrative, practice, and consumer levels of
Based on research conducted at 60 hospitals in the United States, this report recommends
a common planning framework to address the growing linguistic and cultural diversity of hospital patients. The report
argues that planning must be on-going and that solutions must be tailored to the needs and circumstances of individual hospitals.
Serving Patients with Limited English Proficiency: Results of a Community Health Center
National Association of Community
Health Centers (NACHC), June 16, 2008, 19 pp.
Representing over 1,150 community
health centers in the United States, NACHC undertook a survey of its membership to determine the extent to which limited English
proficient patients are served by local centers and the range of techniques used to bridge the language gap. Among other things,
the report found that one in every three patients seen in local centers is LEP, and that 74% of centers use bilingual
nonclinical staff, 59% use bilingual clinical staff, 47% use staff interpreters, 27% use telephonic and/or video services,
and 15% use external language agencies.
Hospitals, Language, and Culture: A Snapshot of the Nation,
The Joint Commission, 2007, 107 pp.
report analyzes how 60 selected hospitals around the country are providing health care to culturally and linguistically
diverse patients and offers recommendations for improving hospital responsiveness to this patient population.
Language Services Resource Guide for Health Care Providers,
National Health Law Program, October,
2006, 186 pp.
This useful guide contains state-by-state listings of language service
associations, providers, and trainers. It also includes a directory of web-based health information resources in foreign languages.
Other sections cover assessment tools and signage.
Certification of Health Care Interpreters in the United States: A Primer, a Status Report and
Considerations for National Certification,
The California Endowment, September,
2006, 95 pp.
Author Cynthia E. Road compares and contrasts nine different existing
certification programs for health care interpreters, as well as the eight state certification programs that were in various
stages of development at the time of publication. She also explains the various strategies for providing quality assurance
in interpreting, of which certification (assessment) is only one part. These strategies include appropriate recruiting, language
screening, training, monitoring, and continuing education.
Globalization, Migration Health, and Educational Preparation for Transnational Medical Encounters,
Peter H. Koehn, Global Health 2006 2:2
This article argues for a new paradigm in medical training called
“transnational competence (TC).” Noting that more than 700 million people cross international borders every
year, whether as visitors, businesspersons, or immigrants, the author argues that the quality of health care, as well as the
success of disease prevention efforts, hinge on the ability to identify “ the special circumstances that surround and
define each individual’s health.” According to the author, TC as a model is preferable to traditional
culture-competence education, which tends to reify cultural characteristics within particular groups, ignoring intra-group
variations, as well as differences of class, generation, experience, and education. The author proposes a far-reaching
set of reforms in medical school education designed to prepare a new generation of medical students for “ethnically
and socially discordant clinical encounters.”
The Interpreter's World Tour: An Environmental Scan of Standards of Practice for Interpreters,
Publication of The California Endowment
for the National Council on Interpreting in Health Care, March, 2005, 44 pp.
As part of an effort to draft a national code of ethics for interpreters in health care, this project reviewed
145 standards documents in 11 languages from 25 countries, including 36 U.S. states. The scan was inclusive of all fields
of interpreting. The scan uncovered both similarities and contradictions in these documents.
Bridging the Cultural Divide in Health Care Settings: The Essential Role of Cultural Broker
Center for Cultural Competence, Georgetown University Center for Child and Human Development, Spring/Summer 2004, 39 pp.
Defining cultural brokering as "the act of bridging, linking, or mediating between
groups or persons of different cultural backgrounds for the purpose of reducing conflict or producing change," this report
spells out the four primary functions of cultural brokers (liaisons, cultural guides, mediators, and catalysts for change) and
the many contexts in which they work. Most cultural brokers assume multiple roles and may not work exclusively as cultural
brokers. Cultural brokers, for example, may be health care professionals, social workers, or community members. They may work
at community health centers, hospitals, government offices, community-based organizations, or religious institutions. The
report features numerous case examples of successful cultural brokering initiatives. The authors also see cultural brokering
as an "essential" to the reduction of health disparities for racial and ethnic populations.
Language Access: Helping Non-English Speakers Navigate Health and Human Services, National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health Care,
National Conference of State Legislatures, January, 2003, 24
As the U.S. population has become more diverse, language has emerged as a critical
factor in health care access and quality. This report indicates that the language gap can lead to delays in or denial of service,
unnecessary tests, more costly or invasive treatment of disease, racial or ethnic disparities in insurance, and other problems.
The report surveys the demographic landscape and current governmental efforts to address language access, focusing on four
states that are using federal matching payments from Medicaid and SCHIP to pay for language interpretation. The report also
outlines "next step" options for states and the federal government.
Final Report, Office of Minority Health, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, March, 2001, 132 pp.
1997, the Office of Minority Health (OMH) began a study and consultation process leading to the publication of this standard-setting
document four years later. A prime motivation for this project was widespread dissatisfaction with the earlier
patchwork of standards that often left health care providers without clear guidance as to what constitutes culturally and
linguistically appropriate services (CLAS). OMH consulted with numerous stakeholders in the field, and after publication of
draft standards in the Federal Register, received comments from 413 individuals and organizations. The standards were published
in final form in 2000. The 14 standards are organized by themes: Culturally Competent Care (1-3), Language Access Services
(4-7), and Organizational Support for Cultural Competence (8-14). Part II of the Report discusses each standard in detail,
covering intent, supportive research, and implementation issues.